Runic tab opinions..

[Jens Thune]

Does this one look ok?

Jens

[Stossgruppe3]

Its certainly an odd one ... are the runes on doe-skin material ?
Regards
David

[Jens Thune]

Same type as this one, just heavily oxidised??
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...Ss+nco+bullion

Jens

[Jens Thune]

Its certainly an odd one ... are the runes on doe-skin material ?
Regards
David

Sorry, i dont have it in hand, only these pictures..

[Jens Thune]

1

[Jens Thune]

3

[Kuifje69]

Dear Jens,

If they are OK I really do not know, but I would pass because:

- The runes are not as tight I would expected
- The back, too much material

This is just my opinion.

Best regards,

Rene

[JLS1963]

Indeed odd, it seems artificially aged on the front but back side is better condition. Best, JLS

[baldy1939]

Not one i would be happy with

[Jens Thune]

Allright thanks guys.. I Will pass

Thanks again
Jens

[Ian Hulley]

The shape and size of the base tab looks more like a LW Pionier tab ?

Ian

[D Davies]

I don't think the runes are artificially aged it just looks like normal oxidisation to me.
I like the base material David i too think it is doe-skin I also like the buckram.
But i also agree with one of rene's points about there being quite a bit of material to the reverse.
There are more posatives than negatives for me.I think i will sit on the fence i just can't decide.
Cheers
Dave.

[Woolgar]

Sorry wrong thread