Herewith a nice pic from a smock and the helmet cover , same patern , but variation at ink density dark and light.......
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
difference between ink density Oak "A" patern
Collapse
X
-
Hi, The main difference is which color is laid down on the white fabric first. These 2 examples show how the colors and edges change depending on which color was screened in which order. The first color usually takes over.
My friend makes all of the top quality SS camo on the reenactment/ movie market and he can duplicate this phenomenon quite easily. All of the SS patterns very depending on the printing order and quality, especially the machine printed ones like Oak and blurred edge.
Comment
-
Today I took a second look at your picture and compared this camo fragment with original samples that I have on file. Interesting observation. I knew that depending on the ink and material used, the density and hue of colors (even) in the same camo pattern can vary, that is subtle differences exist between same camo pattern (pehaps from maker to maker), but I've always thought that there are no differences between the design/picture/geometry of the camo pattern itself, I thought that the number, size, location (etc.), main color, of camo shapes in camo items of the same pattern are always consistent. As I said I compared many camo samples today: Oak-A against Oak-A, Oak-B against Oak-B, etc They are the same only in overall appearance, but they do vary a lot in deatails, almost all of them and sometimes diffrences are huge! Below is just this one fragment you used for your comparison. Next to your two samples are five more. As you can see on the far right is this fragment is very different but it is 100% original, perhaps just a different maker. This is just one example, but there are much more, a lot more differences between other fragments that I saw today.Attached Files
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 3 users online. 0 members and 3 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment