WSS M42/43 fieldgrey combat tunic

[bubaku]

ss tunic

I never see before a tunic 42

with recicled italian stoff and the typical mod.43 inside

[Buckliger]

no worry about markings? right site below indicates the sleve lenght. nobody has 79 cm long arms, even 69cm is very tall. 79cm would be a sleeve lenght of 31,10 inches Don t want to question the tunic, but the marking are not proper.

[Fritz]

In my book an all original tunic with "restored" insignia and possibly east german tresse. Looks like quite a large size to me.

Cheers

[Scott A. Hess]

I dont see anything evil about the tunic or insignia, when the tabs/tresse met the tunic, anyones guess..I agree with Fritz, the tresse would not be what I would want to see, otherwise, nice

[viva_giulio]

I never see before a tunic 42

with recicled italian stoff and the typical mod.43 inside

Pictures are orribile i don't thik is italian wool but a darker green wool. I've seen 7/8 Yeats ago a M42 tunic owned by panzergrenadiere71 with this tone.

But a real 42... Here i think it's just a 43 with pocket features.
Tunic looks convincing but i don't hazzard to give an opinion with these pictures i'm not a fan of back of collar.

[espenlaub]

Just a couple of thoughts. 3/ 525 I have ever seen, was in a huge size font. Never seen a SS tunic with a Heeres type size markings- 44 looks odd to me, and all font looks strange to me. The underliner- reverse of the collar made in a wrong way, the drillich cloth can be stitched even from 4 different pieces, but always diagonal. The connected from 2 pieces liner on both sides, due the overcoats have short liners for reproducing the tunics

[Josh Cowell]

Pictures are orribile i don't thik is italian wool but a darker green wool. I've seen 7/8 Yeats ago a M42 tunic owned by panzergrenadiere71 with this tone.

But a real 42... Here i think it's just a 43 with pocket features.
Tunic looks convincing but i don't hazzard to give an opinion with these pictures i'm not a fan of back of collar.

.?