SS totenkopfring

[jirka12hj]

Hello guys!
For some time now I am the owner of this ring. The name of recipient is Roth and he got it in 20.4. 1938.
Is it possible to get somewhere more information about this person?
Thank You very much!!

[Hoss]

Here's some info courtesy of Axis member Peter from 2011 have you just purchased this ring? (It was posted on the Axis forum) Read the last line the name Roth is well faked.

Eric

If the ring was awarded to an SS officer named ROTH in April 1938 then I think its Adolf Roth.

In the December 1938 SS-DAL there are 7 officers named Roth,

Adolf - had a ring in December 1938 but not in the 1937 DAL
Albert - already had a ring in 1937
Andreas - already had a ring in 1937
Anton - didnt have a ring in December 1938
Gustav - didnt have a ring in December 1938
Matthias - didnt have a ring in December 1938
Peter - already had a ring in 1937

So I think it was :

Adolf Roth (Gold Party Badge & WW1 Front Fighter Medal),
SS-Stammabt 25,
NSDAP # 37 331
SS # 38 353
born 4 Dec 1897 Schneidhart b. Regensburg
SS-Ustuf on 20 Apr 1935
still Ustuf in 1945

He was probably Allg-SS and not Waffen-SS.

I hope that the ring is a real one there are many fakes.

[jirka12hj]

Hello, thank You very much!
This ring is ground dug. I bought it from my firend who found it personally.
I'm sure it's original. Some people from this forum which are versed in these rings confirmed me that it is period piece.
Before I was registered here as a premium member, I asked a few friends to ask about this person and this ring. Therefore, photos and queries to this ring are on other forums and also on this forum.
The owners of this ring is changed as follows - Mr. Roth, my friend finder and then me. In fact, I do not consider that this is my ring.....but it's only in my care. Still belongs to Mr. Roth.
Here are more pictures.

[jirka12hj]

Next pictures.

[jirka12hj]

And next pictures..

[Dedman]

Hello,
I am not Lord of the rings, so I can be easily beaten on this field, but I don´t like the ring. Of course, this does not necessary mean it is 100% fake, but I really don´t like the style of engraving inside and that BIG skull

On my 2 pictures is all what I want to see on early textbook worn pieces...

[jirka12hj]

I have no reason to doubt its authenticity.
There is a stark difference between what you sent and what I sent.
Here are my better pictures.

[jirka12hj]

More pictures.

[jirka12hj]

Next pictures of the inside.

[jirka12hj]

Next inside pics...