SS EM eagle - Opinions

[Daniel.S]

Link 2 and 3 are about a collector named Geir Ove Kvalheim which is accused to have sold fake documents to Norwegian National library

Link 1 is about a SS vet who (whit 5 more SS vets) came up with around 80k euros to Geir ove Kvalheim to make some movie about those vets. Geir seems to be a film-journalist.

Well, they never saw that money again...or a movie.

What bother me most is that when the vets asked for the money back they were accused for being war crimininals and not to be trusted

Seems like Geir got convicted anyway for this too but never paid back.

I hope im reading this right.

Mima, are you Geir Ove Kvalheim?

[Adelheim]

Lombard group

This whole story ended up (for my part) in a phonecall between me and the present owner, where I strongly adviced him NOT to buy the group. So did Peter. So did Derek.

Mima wrote that he, the seller Derek and Peter von Lukas advice the buyer not to buy the Lombard group because it was a fake.<O</O
Does anyone believe that a buyer would pay 20k for a uniform that the seller says is a fake?<O</O
<O</O
Earlier in this tread Derek wrote that he did not knew that the uniform group was fake before he sold it. Mima is telling us that both he and Derek knew that it was a fake before it was sold.<O</O
<O</O
I am glad that it is verified that the seller of the Lombard uniform group knew that he was selling a fake group. <O</O
I now hope that Derek will make this right and take the uniform back and compensate the buyer.<O</O
<O</O
Regards<O</O
Harald<O</O

[Kreager]

All in all it boils down to a bunch of crooked dealers, hmmmm now how about that. So sad but the mighty dollar prevails again.

[Mima]

Dear fellow collectors.

I am so happy that these links were posted. They tell exactly what I have been saying regarding these allegations, and do NOT support Harald Hægs lies of me being convicted of anything. I have never been convicted of anything in my life. The ongoing lawsuit between Fredrik Jensen and myself is refered to in the article, and regards a promissory note and whether that was still due or not. This is still an ongoing process - but consider this: If fraud was an issue in this - why is that not a part of the ongoing lawsuit between us? Not once is fraud mentioned in any of the legal documents in this process. If Jensen really meant that he had been ripped off.... wouldn´t he make this an issue?? It all boils down to this:

Harald Hæg told you all that I was convicted for fraud. He lied. I dared him to post any proof, and he failed. The accusations concerning the false documents..... why is that known? Because I tipped the police! In 2006! Why were the documents revealed as fakes? Because I checked them through a policeofficer who was an expert in handwriting! This is exactly the case with the Lombard-uniform too! It was sold by Weitze. NOT CHECKED. Sold to a collector in Oslo. NOT CHECKED. Sold to Derek. NOT CHECKED. Sold to me: CHECKED! Neither the collector in Oslo or Derek knew it was a fake. What I write in my prior post, is that we all knew AFTER the group had been investigated through Peter von Lukacs and his fellow experts. Now, what happened then? The collector who owns it now, said: There are different opinions, and I choose to trust Weitzes opinion.

Now, Harald, answer this:

1) Was the owner who has it today notified by me that the group was described as fake BEFORE purchasing it from Derek?
2) Did he correspond with me, Derek and Peter von Lukacs through phonecalls and mails about this?
3) Did he visit Weitze after this to receive NEW certificates of authentification?

And just so you wont lie on the forum again: The mails still exists.

I will post a new post later, when I have more time than now. This post will include numerous examples of really expensive groups that Harald Hæg has sold to collectors, and that were all fakes. He claims to be the leading expert on uniforms in Norway, so please keep that in mind when you read about the deal I will enlighten you about. If he is an expert, he must have known. The irony in this? If these collectors had reported this to the police, or made a law suit against Harald Hæg, HE would be convicted of fraud. Again and again and again.....

[Adelheim]

Fraud

First one correction. I wrote that the Lombard group was sold for 20k the correct amount should be 30k.<O</O
<O</O
Geir Ove Kvalheim Mima) I have proven my point. You are convicted for fraud. No doubt. <O</O
<O</O
No one in the Norwegian colleting community takes Kvalheim serious any more. There have been too many new articles about him regarding different frauds. <O</O
The article in Dagbladet from 09.23.2010 clearly shows that Kvalheim is convicted of fraud against former SS front fighter Fredrik Jensen. Several other news papers also have a similar article.<O</O
<O</O
Whenever there is an article in the news paper about Kvalheim his reply is always that he is glad that the matter has come up and that he now can deny the accusations as lies.<O</O
According to Kvalheim everything that is written about him is lies.<O</O
If the news papers always write lies about Kvalheim why has he not taken any legal action against them?<O</O
<O</O
This tread has come to an end and I hope Derek will make this right. The owner of the Lombard group has tried several times during the last 8 years get his money back. He now has all the proof he needs to take legal action against the seller.<O</O
<O</O
I will thank the WAF members for their fantastic knowledge.<O</O
<O</O
Best regards<O</O
Harald Hæg<O</O
LTC (Ret) Norwegian Army<O</O

[DeMil]

Dear Harald Hæg.

"The owner of the Lombard group has tried several times during the last 8 years get his money back. He now has all the proof he needs to take legal action against the seller".

I have never been contacted by the owner were he have asked me to take the complete group back.
He called me and asked if I knew if the group was a fake when I had it in my collection before I sold it.
And as written before I bougtht it and sold it as 100 % original with papers from Helmut Weitze.
But this you do not understand Harald Hæg......


Derek

[Dmv]

Boy what a mudfight!

Again we know what Weitze's "proove" certificates are worth...

What does this artikle say on Dereks website?

http://www.dereksmilitaria.no/nws-de...harald-hg.html

Kvalheim has it's own wikipedia site:
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geir_Ove_Kvalheim

[Mima]

Harald Goebbels Hæg

This is rather pathetic of you Harald, isn´t it? Even you can do better than this?!

I urge all of you fellow collectors to note the following:

1) Harald Hæg started this thread.
2) Harald Hæg made some serious accusations against Derek Schei and myself.
3) Harald Hæg was asked by both me and by Gary Wood to present proofs to this matter.
4) He failed to do so, and now tries to run from the battlefield with his tale between his legs.

The questions I asked him should be easy for him to answer. I have been accused of these matters by nazis that I had infiltrated for several years, and it is easy to understand why they make this accusations. However - if the matter was true, why have they not reported this to the police? The matter is now 12 years old!!!! Why have I not been to court accused of fraud? The newspapers agenda is to describe a conflict, in order to start a debate and sell newspapers, and they all refer to the naziveterans allegations. The only hard proof of fraud would be a police report telling that I had been reported for these matters. That has never been done. Another proof would be a lawsuit against me for fraud. That has never excisted. The articles refers to Jensens accusations, not accusations by the police or by the court.

The truth is this: I have never been comvicted of anything in my whole life. The court decision refered to in the article is a statement that the promissory note from 1999 was legal and could be tried in court. THAT is the only decision, It was sent to me for comments in the summer, and I was on vacation. Therefore, it was immediately appealed, which the article also clearly states.

Dear fellow collectors. Harald Hæg has made the following accusations:

1) Derek sold a group (even though he knew it was a fake), to a collector that did NOT know that the group had been investigated and concluded as fake.
2) I was a middle-man in that transaction
3) I am convicted of fraud.

Do you all agree that these are serious allegations?
Do you all agree that Harald Hæg as a MINIMUM should be able to document the following:

1) A courtdocument, containing a verdict for fraud?
2) Proofs in the matter as to when Derek was told that this group was fake, and proofs as to when the present owner was given this information?
3) Proofs that I had anything to do with the latest transaction between Derek and the present owner?

I ask Harald Hæg several simple questions about the Lombardgroup and its history in my last post. NOTE: He does not answer a single one of them, even though this is a thread HE started, and allthough it conserns allegations HE have made against other users of this forum.

Goebbels once said that you have to make a lie big enough if you want people to believe it. Harald obviously worships this method. Shame on him for being such a liar and such a coward, and shame on him for making such accusations without being able to present you all with the necessary proof.

His agenda is obviously this: Harald failed to be a successful businessman, Derek succeded. Harald had to close down his shop, Dereks shop flourish. Harald is a nobody among the collectors in Norway, Derek has a huge network, and is Norways leading expert. If you wonder why it is so, study every which post from Harald you want in this thread. Honesty rules, Harald. Kindness rules. You should really try it sometime.

[Ian Hulley]

[Lassi]

Anyway I have met Derek in person and have a couple of deals with him and he is IMO a nice and honest guy

Also I think (just my opinion) it is time to close this thread

Regards
Lars

[Gary Wood]

it is time to close this thread

Regards
Lars

I agree thread closed you will have to go elsewhere to continue