Honour ring opinions please

[Patrick W]

Hi Guys

Would appreciate some comments on this one- photos aren't the greatest but looks pretty good so far to me- skull is separately applied apparently, don't know name of holder as of yet

Many thanks

Patrick

[Patrick W]

,,,

[DR DOLCH]

The ring is no doubt a copy. 20.4.1936 would be engraved 20.4.36,no exceptions.

[PaulMann]

awfully minty?

the dr. is correct.
,,also, I would expect a lot more wear on 1936 issued HR.
cheers

[Military]

The leaves are wrong, engraving style wrong, type of inscription wrong as dolch pointed out, hideous skull socket, horrible seam and the list goes on.

[Jon. H]

It's a forgery.

[Patrick W]

Thanks Guys!- saved me some $

[ErichS]

Thanks Guys!- saved me some $

Probably lots of $$$$$$$!