There is a tread on a norwegian collectorforum where the GSSN tunic now availible at Weitze is questioned to be a unknovn tunic applied by original insignia post war.
(the tunic is not a official type but a kind wich came out on the marked some years back)
A member there is defending it and has recomended it 100% ok after hands on inspection. All other collectors are sceptic or reject it.
The member defending it claims the chief of identatur at the FMU ( norwegian defence museum) can vertify that it is ok as there are tunics like the unofficial Amundsen type there. FMU is the only place clamed these are known trough the member defending it.
The one shown is supposed to come as is out of a theater in Bergen, Norway a few years back...but all that and the proviens are IMO proven wrong.
Nobody will claryfy where the Amundsen provience comes from.
Amundsen did not get the KWK wich is in the ribbon of the tunic.
The insignia are documented loose from a collector a few years back.that.
That collector is also a norwegian under a psynonym name.
Pictures are coming, the one posted did occure with error.
(the tunic is not a official type but a kind wich came out on the marked some years back)
A member there is defending it and has recomended it 100% ok after hands on inspection. All other collectors are sceptic or reject it.
The member defending it claims the chief of identatur at the FMU ( norwegian defence museum) can vertify that it is ok as there are tunics like the unofficial Amundsen type there. FMU is the only place clamed these are known trough the member defending it.
The one shown is supposed to come as is out of a theater in Bergen, Norway a few years back...but all that and the proviens are IMO proven wrong.
Nobody will claryfy where the Amundsen provience comes from.
Amundsen did not get the KWK wich is in the ribbon of the tunic.
The insignia are documented loose from a collector a few years back.that.
That collector is also a norwegian under a psynonym name.
Pictures are coming, the one posted did occure with error.
Comment