SS camouflage tunic "erbsentarn"

[Wagenrad]

Is these a original tunic or one of the thousand of copies? Thank you for your opinions! Martin

[Wagenrad]

2

2

[Wagenrad]

3

3

[Wagenrad]

4

4

[Wagenrad]

5

5

[besslein]

not original

[Sonny]

Besslein, could you help me, why is it not original, thanks Sonny

[Erbsentarn]

Hello, i confirm, completely fake....!!!
bad colors...i could send you pictures of my good M44 DOT....
Greets.
gwen.

[Scott A. Hess]

LOoks like they took the time to incorporate original neck closure hardware, I've been thinking based on other repros they have done they either now know how to make it or simply take them out of other pieces or have left overs, but obviously the pattern of the camo is not even close, as others had stated, bad.

[Wagenrad]

Thank you very much for your informations Regards Martin

[viva_giulio]

IMO... this things

1) collar... to much lines
2) reverse side... too darker without trasparence of dot
3) colours
4) neck closure
5) pocket

[Scott A. Hess]

IMO... this things

1) collar... to much lines
2) reverse side... too darker without trasparence of dot
3) colours
4) neck closure
5) pocket

Viva, the neck hardware details look original to me, I question the manner in which it was done, I"ve seen period pics of machines used to affix these, but I dont doubt that this depended on the level of sophisticationof the enterprise, and I also believe these could have been done by hand, but although the actual hardware itself I believe is original (unless they now do a spot on fake) I believe its simply not affixed to the tunic properly.