ss 1/24 skull

[Der Spiess]

Hello, any thoughts about this one?

<img src="http://photos01.allegro.pl/photos/oryginal/307/01/28/307012892">

<img src="http://photos01.allegro.pl/photos/oryginal/307/01/28/307012892_2">

[PMan]

Your skull M1/24

Looks like it could be real, but surely ground dug.
Peter Manzie

[Banzi64]

Does it have have the ss runes?

[bwanek1]

Original.

[bwanek1]

Does it have have the ss runes?

Huh?!

[colt45s]

looks like a cast one that was aged

[bwanek1]

looks like a cast one that was aged

What would lead you to such a conclusion?

I see nothing to suggest that it is anything but original.

[Banzi64]

I was checking because the way he said it made me think it was marked ss m 1/24 and to my understanding originals don't have ss on them I might be wrong I'm trying to learn too.

[bwanek1]

I was checking because the way he said it made me think it was marked ss m 1/24 and to my understanding originals don't have ss on them I might be wrong I'm trying to learn too.

Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you were suggesting that it should have runes. You are correct; no original skull has runic markings.

[Anders S]

I was checking because the way he said it made me think it was marked ss m 1/24 and to my understanding originals don't have ss on them I might be wrong I'm trying to learn too.

You're correct. No originals have the SS markings.

I also agree with Brad that the Overhoff skull which started this thread is an original ground dug piece.

[Banzi64]

I should have elaborated more. I thought it looked too good to be a fake.

[Der Spiess]

Thanks for all opinions, guys!
And another one for review...

[bwanek1]

You should've quit while you were ahead. Still, one out of two ain't bad; you're still batting 500.

[David T]

Ditto on the Overhoff-1/24 (the first skull posted...I cant see the second)...its good.