The word FAKE gets tossed around very easily!
I remember the days when (most) European collectors considered the Dachau shields FAKE...Those were not around much over there and when these US vet hoards started hitting their shores, many EU based collectors had strong doubts...pristine looking and large quantities...and affordable...(like the smocks)...
Some still call them fake...
Reason similar to the smocks:
abundantly available, affordable pricing and in minty unissued condition...(smocks: some/w the rodent damage and pee is certainly not artificial aging! )
Now the shields are all over the place including on tunics...The internet helped correcting that misunderstanding...Same can be said in the other direction...
East coming West...Ukrainian G43 pouches in materials (colors, ersatz) with maker codes never before seen in the west...Never captured...nothing!
So also believed to be fakes...Again huge supplies and reasonably priced. I bought my first G43 pouch in Normandy in 1984 (40th anniversary). Big $ !!!
Hoards sitting in the Ukraine was just unheard of...no internet, cold war barrier etc...things evolve, viewpoints change, stuff surfaces...
So something we are trying to establish here with this topic as well...not just one liner negative comments that are unsubstantiated-unfounded for the most part... (bogus impermeable issue, thickness/density etc..) but at the same time I agree that a lot of what has been posted is circumstantial as well ...
but connecting possible dots should be investigated.
That's why even big time collectors are still sitting on these Pink-Birch smocks in their collections...on the fence...Wanting answers! Waiting for answers...
(image from a big Dutch collection)
I remember the days when (most) European collectors considered the Dachau shields FAKE...Those were not around much over there and when these US vet hoards started hitting their shores, many EU based collectors had strong doubts...pristine looking and large quantities...and affordable...(like the smocks)...
Some still call them fake...
Reason similar to the smocks:
abundantly available, affordable pricing and in minty unissued condition...(smocks: some/w the rodent damage and pee is certainly not artificial aging! )
Now the shields are all over the place including on tunics...The internet helped correcting that misunderstanding...Same can be said in the other direction...
East coming West...Ukrainian G43 pouches in materials (colors, ersatz) with maker codes never before seen in the west...Never captured...nothing!
So also believed to be fakes...Again huge supplies and reasonably priced. I bought my first G43 pouch in Normandy in 1984 (40th anniversary). Big $ !!!
Hoards sitting in the Ukraine was just unheard of...no internet, cold war barrier etc...things evolve, viewpoints change, stuff surfaces...
So something we are trying to establish here with this topic as well...not just one liner negative comments that are unsubstantiated-unfounded for the most part... (bogus impermeable issue, thickness/density etc..) but at the same time I agree that a lot of what has been posted is circumstantial as well ...
but connecting possible dots should be investigated.
That's why even big time collectors are still sitting on these Pink-Birch smocks in their collections...on the fence...Wanting answers! Waiting for answers...
(image from a big Dutch collection)
Comment