Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_2725f32b88ab3abef2eca49df845384c8e14edc864f53f61, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 SS M43 "Florian Geyer" Tunic on E-Stand - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
SandeBoetik

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SS M43 "Florian Geyer" Tunic on E-Stand

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #1

    SS M43 "Florian Geyer" Tunic on E-Stand

    dear Friends, Collectors,
    A collector interested in the M43 "Florian Geyer" tunic that I posted for sell on the forum e-stand , Uniform section, would like to know some opinions on it.
    Thankyou in advance.
    By Lorenz
    Tags: None
    #2
    Hi Lorenz!
    Jacket is very nice with restored but yet nice original insignia IMO!i dont know about the tresse as i cant see the back Straps are Infantry

    Comment

      #3
      very nice late war tunic,from your pics its for me hard to say if the waffenfarbe on
      straps are for cavalery or infanteri,but overall fantastic condition ss43 tunic

      Comment

        #4
        waffenfarbe appears Cavalry which would make sense, FG was a Kav division.

        Comment

          #5
          Cavalry waffenfarbe is Gold yellow if im not wrong??those straps are brighter than a gold yello(might be the flash)but to me it looks infantry colour

          Comment

            #6
            Yes, the flash altered the colour, is yellow cavalry.
            By Lorenz

            Originally posted by lelez View Post
            Cavalry waffenfarbe is Gold yellow if im not wrong??those straps are brighter than a gold yello(might be the flash)but to me it looks infantry colour

            Comment

              #7
              Hi Lorenzo,
              what's up?
              Stupid question maybe but did the SS-BW marker stamp was updated during the war?
              This one is not what I should expect, I hope I'm wrong.
              Attached Files

              Comment

                #8
                Hi Wolhans,
                yes, you are wrong, this are two original SS-BW marker stamp..
                You can update your arkive my friend.
                The difference that you can see, it's only for the different cloth where was printed the SS-BW marker stamp.
                By Lorenz

                Originally posted by wolhans View Post
                Hi Lorenzo,
                what's up?
                Stupid question maybe but did the SS-BW marker stamp was updated during the war?
                This one is not what I should expect, I hope I'm wrong.
                Attached Files

                Comment

                  #9
                  To my eyes, the runic height on the stamp in the camouflage garment does not appear to be the same (right being slightly taller than left) as on the M43 tunic stamp.

                  B. N. Singer

                  Comment

                    #10
                    WoW, interesting judgements. I am not able to say anything from this photos above regarding hights etc. from the runes as there are crinkles on the stamp and the photos are taken under an angle

                    Comment

                      #11
                      here my ss bw stamp,I think the are all little different,but original
                      Attached Files

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Hi Singer,
                        yes, but also the tunics have different stamps ...the dot smooth cotton camo tunic have "M"..the M43 tunic have "N"...this means not producted in the same place...means not the same stamps...SS-BW..means that there were some little difference IMO.
                        The tunics are both Original with Original SS-BW stamps.. number of sizes..this is an occasion to study this thread IMO..naturally.
                        BY Lorenz

                        Originally posted by B. N. Singer View Post
                        To my eyes, the runic height on the stamp in the camouflage garment does not appear to be the same (right being slightly taller than left) as on the M43 tunic stamp.

                        B. N. Singer
                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Lorenz View Post
                          Hi Singer,
                          yes, but also the tunics have different stamps ...the dot smooth cotton camo tunic have "M"..the M43 tunic have "N"...this means not producted in the same place...means not the same stamps...SS-BW..means that there were some little difference IMO... BY Lorenz

                          My observation was only to the extent that the two stamps shown do not (to me) appear to be the same. Certainly, I do not have sufficient knowledge concerning stamps to offer an opinion as to their Originality. However, I have heard it discussed that there was Only One style of SS-BW stamp that was used (and accepted by collectors as Original). Again I cannot comment if this is accurate or not.

                          B. N. Singer

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Hi Singer,
                            yes, we speack about this..but 70 years are gone and how really know all things about this of others things?
                            We can only suppose something, I also dont know all about this, I can ensure the the tunics are both original, with theyr stamps...
                            This is all that I can tell my friend....but I found that it's very important to speack about all this things, to improve our knowledge...day for day...
                            BY Lorenz

                            Originally posted by B. N. Singer View Post
                            My observation was only to the extent that the two stamps shown do not (to me) appear to be the same. Certainly, I do not have sufficient knowledge concerning stamps to offer an opinion as to their Originality. However, I have heard it discussed that there was Only One style of SS-BW stamp that was used (and accepted by collectors as Original). Again I cannot comment if this is accurate or not.

                            B. N. Singer

                            Comment

                              #15
                              .

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There are currently 4 users online. 0 members and 4 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X