Ettiene,
Pardon me for being the pessimist but there are some things that seem odd to me about this piece. In the end this is just one opinion.
The upper breast pockets arent aligned with one another, the curves of the lapel as it descends, the bunching around the shoulder boards, the aging of the collar versus the rest of the tunic, what appears to be a difference in measurement in height of one French cuff to the other. A tailored piece from all appearances which could account for some of those descrepencies but privately tailored tunics, irregardless of branch tend to be of high caliber and this one appears to lack somewhat towards the higher degree of sharpness an officer would be after.
The collar shows evidence of SS tabs, not WH. I would remind everyone, Note the amount of collar wear versus the rest of this piece and the style of attachment of the collar to the tunic itself. While the collar may be legit, I dont think it was originally the one on this tunic. The buttons dont look to be missing paint and the rough wear to the collar and top portion of the liner by the neck dont mesh with the other aging in the tunic.
Again, this is opinion based on a few photos, I thinks its a WH tunic that has been altered to give the appearance of W-SS and that has been resewn with another collar and sewn in boards, both of which appear legit, and then an arm eagle was added and removed, leaving the threading in an attempt to lend further credence to the piece.
If the area above the right breast pocket, as it is worn, is aged more so than that would be another glaring red flag because fakers soak this area to close the wool around where the Eagle would have been.
Thanks and best regards. In the end it is your decision so I wish you well.
Pardon me for being the pessimist but there are some things that seem odd to me about this piece. In the end this is just one opinion.
The upper breast pockets arent aligned with one another, the curves of the lapel as it descends, the bunching around the shoulder boards, the aging of the collar versus the rest of the tunic, what appears to be a difference in measurement in height of one French cuff to the other. A tailored piece from all appearances which could account for some of those descrepencies but privately tailored tunics, irregardless of branch tend to be of high caliber and this one appears to lack somewhat towards the higher degree of sharpness an officer would be after.
The collar shows evidence of SS tabs, not WH. I would remind everyone, Note the amount of collar wear versus the rest of this piece and the style of attachment of the collar to the tunic itself. While the collar may be legit, I dont think it was originally the one on this tunic. The buttons dont look to be missing paint and the rough wear to the collar and top portion of the liner by the neck dont mesh with the other aging in the tunic.
Again, this is opinion based on a few photos, I thinks its a WH tunic that has been altered to give the appearance of W-SS and that has been resewn with another collar and sewn in boards, both of which appear legit, and then an arm eagle was added and removed, leaving the threading in an attempt to lend further credence to the piece.
If the area above the right breast pocket, as it is worn, is aged more so than that would be another glaring red flag because fakers soak this area to close the wool around where the Eagle would have been.
Thanks and best regards. In the end it is your decision so I wish you well.
Comment