2
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Original SS early totenkopf ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by militaria.noHello guys!
What do you think?
Best regards
MariusLast edited by Donald Abenheim; 08-03-2005, 11:17 PM.
Comment
-
That's one of the hoard found in eastern Germany recently. It's 100% original.
It's very distinctive in style. I call it the 'haunted' TK because of the 'sad' eyes.
Some years ago, I saw one of these in zinc so I think these particular skulls date from 1944-ish, intended for army cavalry units rather than the SS. They are always sold as SS-related, however. All those found in the German hoard are nickel, not zinc, but undoubtedly come from the same maker.
Comment
-
Thanks for the above. I have a picayune question. If, indeed, these badges reach back in time to the era before 1918 (und zur Zeit der sogenannten "alten Armee"), can they not have also been in Feinzink before, say, 194X? To be sure, one licks one's lips at the plated tin or Kupal or Buntmetall variety of these things, but I have the sense that some of these regalia makers used all sorts of metals for badges even in the era before-1938 as a function of cost. That is, after years of deciphering the Assmann catalog, there were all levels of regalia and various prices for the same badge. I have seen recently some SS cap insignia on an officer's cap of the era 1935 or so which seems to have been "vernicklet" pot metal, for all the world, which maybe it is also Feinzink, as well. Thanks to colleague Lumsden for a post of great merit.Last edited by Donald Abenheim; 08-05-2005, 05:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robin LumsdenDonald.
I think you're right. Zinc is always considered as being 1942-45, but they used it widely for pickelhaube plates etc. during WW1.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment