SS Belt

[condor36]

I would like to know your opinion regarding this belt. I think it's absolutely original and in pristine condition; the only thing that seem strange is the steel belt hook. I have always thought that, for a such a belt, an aluminium one would have been more appropriate. Let's see what you think guys
Thanks in advance.

[condor36]

B

[condor36]

C

[condor36]

D

[condor36]

E

[ton g]

I have my doubts on belt and label...
Maybe better post in the belts and buckle forum.

Grss

[greg.p]

its an O&C, cant comment on orig. SS

[Vladislav]

In my opinion, the entire value of this belt wanted to reduce to the manufacturer's tag.I wouldn't be sure about it

[condor36]

Hi friend, someone has fotos of labels like this??
I would be curios to see a comparison.

Best Regards

[Vladislav]

here is with Russian forum photo apart from the label and the black threads, there is no other reason to attribute this belt to the SS.And if there is no convincing evidence it is better to pass by the purchase.

[jmb]

Hi friend, someone has fotos of labels like this??
I would be curios to see a comparison.

Best Regards

Matching set previously posted by member p38.
Leather belt with half missing label, iron hook, black thread, stamped SS 1325/43 RZM.

[Vladislav]

It is not clear whether there are any brands on the topikstarter belt? If there is then you need to look and then there are chances

[greg.p]

the belt is original, has a overhoff & cee clasp & theres a chance the tag is original to the belt.

[Vladislav]

AHHH I didn't immediately notice it looks like this is the order 1325 as in the photo below Some collectors reject this order, basing their opinion on the fact that after 40 years, SS stamps were not put on leather products .Although I personally like these belts, there are many of them, and almost all of them are of excellent quality.