M24

[Dete]

Hello,
i always was pretty sure that everything is ok with this one. But seeing some pictures of really good fakes recently, i would appreciate some opinions from other collectors.
Thx in advance.
Detlev

[Dete]

2.

[Dete]

3.

[mambo]

some better pictures are needed on this one i think

looks like a very good fake to me. but i am no expert

[MG34NZ]

Looks good to me

[Erbsentarn]

Hello Detlev,
All good..
i've got the same in my collection...
Regards
gwen

[Lon]

Not just good, excellent!

[BrunoH]

Hi,
Just a stupid question.. normal to have 'RR' markings and no a inversed 'R' followed by a 'R' ?
Thanks in advance

[jeeeensy]

Hi Detlev...... nothing wrong with this one ,, very nice,,,,,100% original.
early RR's were back to back ( reversesd ) but later they seem to be the same direction,
also the RR changed to brb later in production.

regards nick,,

[BrunoH]

Ok, Thanks Nick

[Grenademan2005]

Only pull cord and zunder is not right. Brass connectors are for BZ24, (lead body) fuzes. That one is the body with broken top connector BZ39, (aluminium body). About RR reversed or not you can find them on both types in early and later grenades. The grenade itself is totally 100% original. 1940 was the first year on non printed cans. I will post some pics later.

[Dete]

thx a lot for your responds.
regards
Detlev