BunkerMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

KM reefer for review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    KM reefer for review

    Hello,

    I am looking at this KM reefer as my first one in a collection of KM uniforms.
    It looks really nice, but I'd like to hear more experienced opinions.

    No lapel buttonholes, but that's not so rare to find.

    Thanks in advance!
    Andjelo
    Attached Files

    #2
    ...
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      .....
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        .......
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          It has some unusual features I think, the eagle is an uncommon variation with the wing feathers going in a different direction to most you see. Is the jacket a foreign made example perhaps?

          Eduardo will probably be along with an expert opinion at some stage.

          Regards,

          Jerry

          Comment


            #6
            Yes, the eagle's wing feathers are "wrong-directioned".

            However, rarely we can see those, like on the photo below (upper one).
            It must be a kind of private-purchase, as I consider the whole tunic, also.

            However, I'm not an expert so I'd like to hear Eduardo's or Michel's opinion (not to forget all the others knowledgeable colleagues ).
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              Andjelo, not for me, from pictures looks as post-war 3 button holes jacket
              Collector of Kriegsmarine and Küstenartillerie items

              Regards
              Eduardo


              Collecting Kriegsmarine !!!: http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=725610

              sigpic "Deutsche Kriegsmarine"

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by amiklic1 View Post
                Yes, the eagle's wing feathers are "wrong-directioned".

                However, rarely we can see those, like on the photo below (upper one).
                It must be a kind of private-purchase, as I consider the whole tunic, also.

                However, I'm not an expert so I'd like to hear Eduardo's or Michel's opinion (not to forget all the others knowledgeable colleagues ).
                Indeed, a rarely seen variation of which I have a Heer example in my collection and only know of a handful of others in collections.

                Regards,

                Jerry
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #9
                  yup

                  Well I guess you got your answer, better now than later.

                  Peto at point

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Of course.

                    Thanks Eduardo!!!!

                    I should have knowwhen I saw those three buttonholes on the inside-out photo.

                    KM has fully functional buttons.


                    So, I'm skipping this one...

                    Comment

                    Users Viewing this Thread

                    Collapse

                    There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                    Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                    Working...
                    X