M42 Liner query.

[RobertCOUTTS]

Hi,
have a M42 Heer helmet, liner is marked size 57 correct size for the Shell also is Rbn marked and dated but is also the number 60 stamped inside liner what would this number relate to? Helmet itself seems okay anyhow any ideas appreciated as to the liners originality.
cheers Robert

[RobertCOUTTS]

M42 Liner

These are the numbers referred to.

[RobertCOUTTS]

M42

The inside showing liner size 57 stamped.

[RobertCOUTTS]

M42

another of the liner. Any doubts as to it, liner band itself is original.
cheers Robert

[Jan B]

Hello Robert

Nothing wrong with that liner as far as I can see!

Cheers

Jan

[Daniele C]

late war liner IMO

[Marc Walker]

Authentic liner that doesn't look to have ever been worn. Likely a unissued piece that was placed in that shell. To me the condition (lack of wear) compared to the shell, would raise doubts as to when it was put in there. The dirt and stains on the leather are probably from poor storage post war.
6-43 is the date and the number 60 inside the leather is to identify the largest size that leather piece could be used for. Turns out it was cut short when it was used to make a 57.

[combat-helmets]

6-43 is the date and the number 60 inside the leather is to identify the largest size that leather piece could be used for. Turns out it was cut short when it was used to make a 57.

Took the words right out of my mouth! There was a similar thread on this issue not too long ago... I personally like the helmet very much! Alot of character on that one!

[RobertCOUTTS]

M42 Liner

Thanks guys you answered my queries to a tee. The 60 had me confused what you told me now makes sense. The helmet itself I like I prefer items which have seen service and show it especially with all the reproductions now coming out I notice helmets which are supposed to be correct weight with correct markings, will there be a time when these become a problem or are they easily spotted.
cheers Robert