For Those Who Know These

[JR.]

I realize the photos are limited, but present these that I have. ?

1. Yes
2. Possible
3. No
4. More photos required

Q64


Thank you for your assistance.


JR

[ROBB]

Crap liner . Rob

[JR.]

So crap liner = fake liner~ fake helmet, for ROBB


Thank you.

[Dan-K]

Lot # ?

Lot # would confirm at least that the decal is legit .

[JR.]

Lot #1811

[panzer1432]

Looks very suspect...not a helmet I would pursue

[dragnet]

Crap liner . Rob

And I thought the liner looked good

[sisifo]

Ask for better pics. these photos sucks

[anmarlodz]

Crap liner . Rob

May I ask what is wrong with liner ? It has pig leather ( which looks good to me) something normal in mid to late war period.

[Matt M]

Could be a M35 Re-issued with a later liner.
The photos are terrible.
Would need much better phots to give an opinion on the paint.

Matt

[Dan-K]

Camo ?

Pig skin liner in an M35 would be a re-issue . Better pics in natural sun light would really tell the story .

[ROBB]

Yes Pig skin should be in later helmet . My mistake could be a reissue, photo number 5 tells a different story. In my defence I was washing my hands and looking at the iphone screen at the same time and I dropped my sanitizer on the floor and as I went to pick it up my mask slipped over my eyes . Had photo number 5 been posted then my view would have been different . Rob

[BobI]

I definately like the liner and I am pretty sire the paint is fine too. A "hands on" is better but most likely fine.
Bob

[ENGLISH BOB]

It looks like my pig skin liner but in my defence i haven't sold it yet

[ValhallaMilitaria]

To me it looks like postwar overpaint was removed at some point, agree with others about decal and liner.
Eric
And yes, the photos truly are awful.