Infantry and Pz Jager boards "need help"

[MULON]

Ciao a tutti
I'm here to ask your help about these two pairs of shoulder boards.

1-M40 Pz Jager
IMO good although very small, I think that the "structure" is correct, and I point out that three different types of wool have been used for their packaging.
The thing that troubles me is the thickness of the farbe.
What do you think?

[MULON]

2-M40 Infantry Unterfeldwebel

I think these are good too, and my only doubt is related to the presence together of wool farbe and rayon for the closing flap.
What do you think?

[Glenn McInnes]

Both pairs look good to me.










Glenn

[chainsawrich]

Both pairs look good to me.










Glenn

I will 2nd that motion , all good

[MULON]

Thank you guys.

[GAMS1]

Both looks good but you are right , straps silk backing with wool piping conjugaison is unusual !
Silk appeared in 1942 and wool piping is "normally "not observed after 1941 ...
Nick

[Hptm. Fuhrmann]

I can't shake the feeling that they are both fakes. They both have cut-after buttonholes without a cord and a short, loose bartack. The buttonhole on the white piped straps seems to have a tighter stitch density, but besides that they look eerily similar to me, and then there's also the issue with wool piping and rayon lining. I wouldn't feel comfortable with those.

[Lloyds]

they look ok to me

[madandi]

I don´t like the PzJg boards. The infantry are ok.

[Stive]

I also have doubts about the shoulder boards of PzJg