Billy Kramer

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GD Cufftitle Opinions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    GD Cufftitle Opinions

    Good afternoon,

    I have been offered this cufftitle and wanted to get some opinions on it before I either go through with the deal or pull out of it.

    Before you read further I understand the tendency to look at an item and not want to go out on a limb and comment on it out of fear that your assessment may be incorrect. In this case with this being a "non-standard" version I think there are no wrong answers. All I ask is that you look at the pics and judge the title on the merits of its construction, material quality, wear, and any other data point we would normally use to determine originality. Take a shot in the dark and lay out what your GUT feeling is on it.

    A little background - these pictures have been reviewed by Scott Pritchett and he would not come out and say with 100% certainty that he thought it was a repro or fantasy piece as he has never seen one before. He provided some technical information on the distribution of the different patterns of GD titles and then left the discussion open as to whether-or-not one like this could have been produced, but with no solid proof behind its wartime production/distribution he said there was a slight possibility it is another variation that has not yet been encountered. This is not blessing it - just saying it cannot be ruled a fake (yet).

    Understanding Scott has handled more GD material than probably all of us combined and his expertise is rock solid, I was told by the seller that both Peter von Lukacs and Klaus Butschek have both seen at least pics of this title and deemed it a rare, original variation. The seller stands behind the title and fact that it has been vetted 1000% and encouraged me to post it for discussion so if either of you see this Thread and say this is not true please say so and I will go back to him about that.

    I have agonized over the pics and in terms of the construction characteristics of a Third Reich cufftitle I feel it is 100% in conformity with original insignia that uses this type of base cloth, sewing, different bobbin thread, shows this degree of wear, etc.. The one and only thing I can say with 100% certainty that is not in conformity with the 1st pattern GD is the formation of the "ss" characters (does not have the vertical diagnol stroke) and the other point that is purely a preference is that I am not crazy about double strand stitching on period pieces as is seen on the material fold at the back where it is butted together. I know this vs. single strand was done, but it is the exception in period hand sewing.

    So I'll be the first one on the limb - and I by no means am trying to grasp for branches here. I have never seen another one like this discussed nor offered as a repro somewhere etc.. hence because of that and its construction details and character I think it is an original cufftitle that was produced in very limited numbers between the time they went from the green band of the 1st pattern to the black Sutterlin.

    Anybody else willing to give a gut feeling? All comments are sincerely appreciated.

    vr

    Bob
    Attached Files

    #2
    2.
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      3.
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        4.
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          5.
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #6
            6.
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              Hi Bob.....
              Ok....if I can give my opinion is...I would't want it in my collection
              I'm not saying, as well, it's a fake but it's too much odd.....
              1) It's a mix between first and third type.
              2) Never seen on period pics
              I agree that from these pics looks convincing and the script seems well executed but I bet it's not a gift and I would not spend a lot of money in it without to be sure to get it back if I have to sell it in a near/far future.....
              On the other side it could turn out to be the rarest GD cufftitle ever seen, and in this case.."BINGO"....but I wouldn't run the risk
              Of course IMHO....
              All my best
              Giorgio

              Comment


                #8
                Grazie Mille a mio fratello Italiano

                I understand the points you make below and you are correct, it is not a gift. It is part of the group in the photo here. The trade is very favorable considering the other pieces so I think the risk is OK.

                Ciao!

                Berto


                Originally posted by giorgio View Post
                Hi Bob.....
                Ok....if I can give my opinion is...I would't want it in my collection
                I'm not saying, as well, it's a fake but it's too much odd.....
                1) It's a mix between first and third type.
                2) Never seen on period pics
                I agree that from these pics looks convincing and the script seems well executed but I bet it's not a gift and I would not spend a lot of money in it without to be sure to get it back if I have to sell it in a near/far future.....
                On the other side it could turn out to be the rarest GD cufftitle ever seen, and in this case.."BINGO"....but I wouldn't run the risk
                Of course IMHO....
                All my best
                Giorgio
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #9
                  As has already been said, doesn't conform to any known original, but its obviously high quality, I guess in the end its up to you, if it comes with a "grouping" would have been nice to have at least one photo in the album showing it in wear, and of course if you ever decided to sell it on....well good luck with that.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It is not a type I am familiar with but I find it very convincing. I suggest you contact Scott Pritchett for his insight.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by OSS View Post
                      It is not a type I am familiar with but I find it very convincing. I suggest you contact Scott Pritchett for his insight.
                      Somebody is just looking at the pictures and not reading the blurb

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I agree with the others, I have never seen this building.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Thanks for the comments gentlemen, and yes Rikster, you are correct

                          OSS - I did seek Scott out on this and he pretty much said the same things as you guys (paraphrasing here "not seen it before, can't say it's bad, well done, possible rare variation, etc..").

                          The fact that it just doesn't smack us in the face and say "I'm bad" I think is a good thing. Again, I'm not grasping at straws, just trying hard to maintain an objective perspective so as to not throw the baby out with the bath water on what has a fair chance of being a very rare title.

                          I take the approach that when there are characteristics in a piece that are hallmarks of a fake then to me that is usually a pretty good indicator that it is a turd just dressed up. If I see no liabilities except that we haven't seen one before, well that starts to get the encouraging juices flowing. The piece obviously has to stand the test of believability (unlike say a bullion Knight's Cross or something wacky like that) and in this one I can see a remote possibility of a design shift, hybrid, prototype as the transition took place from the green 1st pattern to the black Sutterlin. If bad, with this style of embroidery I'm shocked we wouldn't have encountered another one as I think the fake would have been produced in greater numbers than originals would have been produced during the war.

                          Not drinking the kool-aid - just keeping an open mind at this point.

                          Again, appreciate the comments guys and please keep them coming.

                          vr

                          Bob

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Ciao Berto.....
                            You're welcome.....
                            I went on to look at your pics a lot of times and I find it very convincing as well.....
                            so...... I think it could be a after-war cufftitle to sew on tunic during veterans meeting....if it has been made in the years immediatly after the war 1948-55 I think it could be made with the same materials and with the same carefulness (maybe by the same firm that did the war period CT, why not?)......... do you know if this guy survived the war? Are there, in the album, pics of him after the war? .......of course that's just my assumption.
                            Again
                            Ciao
                            Giorgio

                            Comment


                              #15
                              cuff

                              Yes, the cufftitle does look like it could be a period piece and extremely interesting at that. If it came as part of a group of items to one person I would find it very useful and interesting to know if an exact date for the soldier's time with the unit is known. A friend I knew served just before the "GD" name was used and never heard of the "Grossdeutschland" term and only referred to the "Wachregiment". Secondly, it might be useful to show this cufftitle next to a first pattern with the same lettering just for comparison. To me it looks like a most unlikely combination of lettering on a heavier cuffband, yet still rather convincing. I'll take one for Christmas, but if another shows up by then it would be a bad sign in my opinion.,

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X