Tunic stamp, good or bad?

[MASteel]

Hello,

This stamp is on LW 4-pocket tunic and I wonder if it's ok?

Looks like lining has been sewed so that first letter of manufacturers name & one size digit are now hidden..? Would this mean that lining has been touched sometime after this left manufacturers premises..?




Here is one and only shot available of the tunic. All metal badges are repros.




Thanks,
Miikka

[steiner99]

Looks good to me.

[Richard P]

The stamps look fine, and the lining probably had that seam added as some tunics have it there at manufacture, and some don't. It may have taken in a little extra lining material.

Richard

[Glenn Barbaritz]

definitely a good stamp. I never saw one over stitched like that though. another first.

[airborne_steve]

Good maker/depot stamp, however, a very small size. Great tunic!

[vbergman1]

I don't think that's a seam; it's just the lining has a fold pressed into it at that location.

[Kengir]

Looks like a good stamp to me!

[MASteel]

Thank you Gentlemen

I think I'll go after this tunic, though the small size makes me hesitate a bit..

-Miikka

[Richard P]

Many original uniforms are very small....many of the wearers were very young.

Richard

[MASteel]

Many original uniforms are very small....many of the wearers were very young.

Richard

Very true. I've quite a many Finnish tunics in my collection and I think European sizes 48-50 are the most common ones to find in here. And summer tunics are minus one size.

-Miikka

[Mike Davis]

I don't think that's a seam; it's just the lining has a fold pressed into it at that location.

Of course, it is just a fold. Sheesh.

[MASteel]

Thanks! I've asked more pics from the seller + information about the stamp area!

-Miikka