CEJ Books

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

m36 art. feldbluse opinions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    m36 art. feldbluse opinions?

    For whatever reason, everything(colors and such) shows up WAY brighter then in real life.
    anyway, would love to hear opinions.
    Thanks!






    #2

    some mothing


    Comment


      #3
      One thing im confused about is (pretty hard to see) near the left side of the eagle you can see what seems to be the ghost of the stiching of an older eagle which would seem strange on a replica, yes? . . . im pretty new at this.

      Comment


        #4
        Maybe pictures but seems not an authentic tunic IMO, has it any stamp?
        Luca
        Siam fatti cosi!

        Comment


          #5
          . . . what i was afraid of. no stamp. guess that should have been a redflag but i also thought it might be a private purchace due to its large size. probabaly just wishful thinking

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by LordWinter View Post
            . . . what i was afraid of. no stamp. guess that should have been a redflag but i also thought it might be a private purchace due to its large size. probabaly just wishful thinking
            I am afraid LordWinter but materials and construction are not from WWII.
            By these pictures could be a Janke made tunic, sorry, let's see what other members think about.
            Just my opinion.
            Luca
            Siam fatti cosi!

            Comment


              #7
              Besides missing any markings, the tunic is missing the horizontal seams (chest darts)
              that are usually seen between the upper pockets and armholes. Most modern repros at least have this detail.
              Tunic is also missing any feel of age...even storage wear.

              Perhaps the sign of a previous eagle is where a reenactor removed a really bad repro bird and replaced it with this one.

              Paul

              Comment


                #8
                Tunic

                Originally posted by Paul McKee View Post
                Besides missing any markings, the tunic is missing the horizontal seams (chest darts)
                that are usually seen between the upper pockets and armholes. Most modern repros at least have this detail.
                Tunic is also missing any feel of age...even storage wear.

                Perhaps the sign of a previous eagle is where a reenactor removed a really bad repro bird and replaced it with this one.

                Paul
                I agree, IMO this looks like it is post war made, collar is weird, the cut of the tunic etc. I would saw this is a reenactor tunic.

                Comment


                  #9
                  yes, the chest darts (or lack there of) were also bothering me quite a bit, guess i was right. thank you very much everyone!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    There is something extrange in the pockets wich i donĀ“t like at first sight, something does not macht with the tunic

                    Regards

                    Acer

                    Comment

                    Users Viewing this Thread

                    Collapse

                    There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                    Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                    Working...
                    X