CollectorsGuild

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FG 42 bayo good???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    FG 42 bayo good???

    Greetings gents,
    just in,looks like FG 42 bayonet for the second model to me,is it original ?
    Thank you for your opinions.
    Gustav
    Attached Files

    #2
    more pics
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      Gustav,

      Was this the one that was for sale on gun.de - ?
      I saw one very similar there, with the clunky Haenal stamp/hammer.

      I did not bid, (and I need a G-type bayonet,) as I could find no literature on Haenel ever manufacturing parts for the Krieghoff (Fzs) or L.O.Dietrich (Gcy) or the intermediate manufacture Rhinemetal - who use an "infiniti" (sidewise 8) type logo.
      I am sure some parts were out-sourced, as often happened. But, I could personally not find evidence of the bayonets being made by Haenel (Fxo) or of Haenel ever stamping their factory code quite like that -
      I own several Haenel MP44's - the stamp is always very nice and concise.
      Maybe this was not the case with their bayonet work?

      I also do not like the end-cap with the cross-wise cut in it -
      The FG42 bayonets I have seen use a plug which is sunk below the outside lip, and not removable.
      I have seen and handled three G-type bayonets - and have photos of several more in my collection.
      *As I mentioned I am looking for this item, and own the Estes reproduction and a converted Mas bayonet, which was the original inspiration.

      Also, the position of the factory stamp is different on the original bayonets I have seen, Gcy or Fzs just above the lower moving lock pin.
      The locking lugs on the pictured one look hand filed and sharp - very different to every FG42 bayonet I have photographed, which just like the Mas bayonet they have concisely machined curves and flats.

      I am also lost as to why there is an extra hole in the body of this one.

      I looked and looked at the auction, as it was very reasonably priced, and finally decided against it. The late-war (late 1944 serial #) FG I own is extraordinarily well finished, testament to Krieghoff quality control even late in the game - the bayonet pictured is not obviously as well finished, even taking into account time and poor storage.

      There may be more knowledgable experts here, I am still a neophyte with the fallschirmjagergewehr.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by pitfighter View Post
        Gustav,

        Was this the one that was for sale on gun.de - ?
        I saw one very similar there, with the clunky Haenal stamp/hammer.

        I did not bid, (and I need a G-type bayonet,) as I could find no literature on Haenel ever manufacturing parts for the Krieghoff (Fzs) or L.O.Dietrich (Gcy) or the intermediate manufacture Rhinemetal - who use an "infiniti" (sidewise 8) type logo.
        I am sure some parts were out-sourced, as often happened. But, I could personally not find evidence of the bayonets being made by Haenel (Fxo) or of Haenel ever stamping their factory code quite like that -
        I own several Haenel MP44's - the stamp is always very nice and concise.
        Maybe this was not the case with their bayonet work?

        I also do not like the end-cap with the cross-wise cut in it -
        The FG42 bayonets I have seen use a plug which is sunk below the outside lip, and not removable.
        I have seen and handled three G-type bayonets - and have photos of several more in my collection.
        *As I mentioned I am looking for this item, and own the Estes reproduction and a converted Mas bayonet, which was the original inspiration.

        Also, the position of the factory stamp is different on the original bayonets I have seen, Gcy or Fzs just above the lower moving lock pin.
        The locking lugs on the pictured one look hand filed and sharp - very different to every FG42 bayonet I have photographed, which just like the Mas bayonet they have concisely machined curves and flats.

        I am also lost as to why there is an extra hole in the body of this one.

        I looked and looked at the auction, as it was very reasonably priced, and finally decided against it. The late-war (late 1944 serial #) FG I own is extraordinarily well finished, testament to Krieghoff quality control even late in the game - the bayonet pictured is not obviously as well finished, even taking into account time and poor storage.

        There may be more knowledgable experts here, I am still a neophyte with the fallschirmjagergewehr.
        Many thanks for your opinions,this one came from a friend of mine,just wanted to know if it had chance...

        Comment


          #5
          I had one. Does it have the chicken stamped in it? Not a Waffen stamp. The imperial type eagle stamp? That would be the original

          Comment

          Users Viewing this Thread

          Collapse

          There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

          Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

          Working...
          X