Opinion mg 42

[cancerbero]

[cancerbero]

[cancerbero]

[cancerbero]

[cancerbero]

[cancerbero]

[HENRY BUCKI]

my Opinion ,its not safe to fire

[Paul Ba]

Original

[NORDLAND1]

Hello. I want see more and better pics from this MG42.is it possible?Please from all sites and the butt stock too!!!
But these photos are really... ähhhm ...****.

Many Greetings NORDLAND

[me6_130]

You certainly have TWO MGs there... a 34 in the first two post and a 42 later. They are real...but not mint, though. The 34 seems to have mixed parts as the bipod is for a 42. The 42 has also been made up a bit and the pistol grip doesn't match the rest.


Carles

[Patty D]

You certainly have TWO MGs there... a 34 in the first two post and a 42 later. They are real...but not mint, though. The 34 seems to have mixed parts as the bipod is for a 42. The 42 has also been made up a bit and the pistol grip doesn't match the rest.

Carles

Carles the bipod on the 34 isn't an mg42 bipod but an mg13 bipod I think?

[me6_130]

Carles the bipod on the 34 isn't an mg42 bipod but an mg13 bipod I think?

Yes, it could be so. I had the impression it had been made out of scrap parts mixing 34 and 42 parts. Not the best pics either...

Carles

[Tony Mickelson]

Poor pictures, but what I see looks like original ground dug up MG34 and MG42 relics. Definitely their best days are behind them, but still makes two nice historic displays in my opinion .