Depending on your definition of rare...
I suppose one could claim a 42 dou "rare" as they are less common for sure... I would say "less common" or at most scarce.
Regarding the dou45 I can't agree unless you are referring to "German" production in matching condition..., which went at least into the "e" range.
These are fairly scarce, but the Czech versions are more common & draw no premium at all- quite the opposite (these went well into the "L" range- probably beyond as I have in my database 9463 l and that is very near the end, -
Law & Jensen's research is way off in regards to these late rifles (the 1991 article by Jensen for the kcn listed "b" range for dou 45- a much dated & obsolete range by today's standards), the rc imports have changed the work of Jensen & Law greatly, and not only in regard to late dou & Steyr production.
Perhaps this subject is a matter of definitions? I do not use the word "rare" very often & when I do I include "condition" of the rifle in that equation.
I suppose one could claim a 42 dou "rare" as they are less common for sure... I would say "less common" or at most scarce.
Regarding the dou45 I can't agree unless you are referring to "German" production in matching condition..., which went at least into the "e" range.
These are fairly scarce, but the Czech versions are more common & draw no premium at all- quite the opposite (these went well into the "L" range- probably beyond as I have in my database 9463 l and that is very near the end, -
Law & Jensen's research is way off in regards to these late rifles (the 1991 article by Jensen for the kcn listed "b" range for dou 45- a much dated & obsolete range by today's standards), the rc imports have changed the work of Jensen & Law greatly, and not only in regard to late dou & Steyr production.
Perhaps this subject is a matter of definitions? I do not use the word "rare" very often & when I do I include "condition" of the rifle in that equation.
Originally posted by david w
Comment