Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_e383be6c4075a557a67a5b02d84c878e7a2f67a360a0cc4a, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Luger take down tool. Is it original? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
MilitariaPlaza

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Luger take down tool. Is it original?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #16
    Originally posted by Frogprince View Post
    I know that they are faking almost everything now, but I also have an Eagle/63 tool. That I got a number of years ago from a friend of mine who was an old time serious P.08 collector. FP
    But was it marked like this one or was it just the eagle and 63?

    Comment

      #17
      Hi,

      I think this thread got a little off track.

      Here is the Luger tool marking that is in dispute.

      http://lmd-militaria.com/page0197.html

      Regards, Leon

      Comment

        #18
        I understand that in essence, both "Eagle-WaA63" and "Eagle-63" markings are correct.
        Now of course, the one from eBay is miles away from this one.

        Originally posted by GWA View Post
        Tools made for commercial sales were unmarked.
        (BTW, WWI tools from DWM were unmarked too, commercial as well as military ones. But I won't go off track in that way either.)
        Attached Files
        Last edited by Edelweiss; 05-08-2009, 12:56 PM.

        Comment

          #19
          Hi Chris,

          IMO, you got it.

          Regards, Leon

          Comment

            #20
            I agree.

            Comment

              #21
              First thing is that I am no way near the expert than some are on this subject. My opinion is worth what you pay for.

              I say fake and not a very good one.

              On the tools which I can compare this to there are 2 conditions that stand out.

              The first is the depth of the stamp, to deep. All the tools I have seen the stamps are not deep and it looks like they are stamped in harden steel. This one looks complete even tho it was struck at an angle.

              The second is the radius of the edges. My tools have a nice small radius compared to this one. The larger radius is also a indication of softer metal, (cheap).

              Jerry

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next

              Users Viewing this Thread

              Collapse

              There are currently 3 users online. 0 members and 3 guests.

              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

              Working...
              X