Not bad for a Fake, seen a lot worse over the years 
-
-
Hj
Owner asked me to add these pics for more info.Comment
-
Hj
MoreComment
-
Hj
1Comment
-
Hj
2Comment
-
Hj
Last oneComment
-
Its still not correct. RZM marked would not have a factory engraving on the hilt as it would not be allowed with the code. Also the shape of the blade is off as is the RZM number. Scabbard looks too long and too narrow. Photos aren't good either.Comment
-
Except for the obvious mistakes in the marks "Z" replacing the "7" and the year "1939" which is too late for a mottoed HJ-knife; this knife is very similar to the originals made by this maker: shape of the blade, style of ricasso, letter type used for the marks, ... all appear the same (see pics hereunder). The script of the motto is a bid off.
Pommel etch is not what you like to see on a 1939 HJ-knife.
Would be interesting to have a hands-on examination of this one.
Best regards,
VictormanComment
-
Great comparison post Victorman !
your knife is a beauty
B.R Mac 66Comment
-
The first one is certainly a new one , minimum visible on leather securing strap, so doesnt look 75 years old leather, the rivets are too problematic.I am not expert on HJ knives. b.r.Andy
MZ stamped instead of M7 is most real sign that this was declared as reproduction, never made as fake.Comment
Comment