98k bayonet - Marking ?

[Mansteinpearl]

Hello dears friends,

What do you think about this one ?
I think it's a crap (70's)
A men think that a private bought of an unteroffizier

Thanks

[DOUDOU555]

Hello, this is my bayonet.
It is a memory of a former combatant of the French 9th DIC.
Here are some more pictures.
The manufacturer is SOLINGEN
Thank you in advance for your opinions.

[bodes]

Hello, this is my bayonet.
It is a memory of a former combatant of the French 9th DIC.
Here are some more pictures.
The manufacturer is SOLINGEN
Thank you in advance for your opinions.

Sir, Solingen is the town in Germany where these bayonets were made.....Bodes

[bodes]

Hello dears friends,

What do you think about this one ?
I think it's a crap (70's)
A men think that a private bought of an unteroffizier

Thanks

I believe it's an original.....Bodes

[AndyB]

Same opinion, looks like correct old KS98 with interesting unit etch and a combat S84/98 that should be oiled or lightly cleaned.What is stamping on the combat piece?

[Mansteinpearl]

However, the marked unit does not exist!
It is marked "Panzer Abw 25" when the real name is "Panzer Abw Abt 25"!
How do you explain this mistake?

Here are links daggers for equivalent units / sisters:

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru....php?p=1606322
Marking said ok. The unit is properly marked! Not like yours BLANKET

http://www.wardaggers.com/B307.htm
The above, the unit is properly marked (although partially erased). Furthermore, the phrase data indicated therein by BMC.
In addition, the markings appear cleaner and better finished thereon


Here is another
  http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/k98-ba...iginal-229244/

The marking is postwar according to several people

[AndyB]

From The Lexikon of Wehrmacht. The location of Kornwestheim ist correct on etch. "Am 6. Oktober 1936 wurde die Abteilung zur Panzer-Abwehr-Abteilung 25 umbenannt. Die Abteilung wurde jetzt der neuen 25. Infanterie-Division unterstellt. 1937 verlegt die Abteilung nach Kornwestheim, ebenfalls Wehrkreis V. "

[DOUDOU555]

However, the marked unit does not exist!
It is marked "Panzer Abw 25" when the real name is "Panzer Abw Abt 25"!
How do you explain this mistake?

Here are links daggers for equivalent units / sisters:

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru....php?p=1606322
Marking said ok. The unit is properly marked! Not like yours BLANKET

http://www.wardaggers.com/B307.htm
The above, the unit is properly marked (although partially erased). Furthermore, the phrase data indicated therein by BMC.
In addition, the markings appear cleaner and better finished thereon


Here is another
  http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/k98-ba...iginal-229244/

The marking is postwar according to several people

Marking can be reduced by the burner because of the importance of the text?
It would be great if someone had a catalog showing the engraving.
Many people think it is rather good.

[tranchant]

ks 98

hello
no problem on this KS, 100% ORIGINAL
best regards
patrick

[tranchant]

engraved

hello
re
you can find this same gravur in the original HOLLER catalog!!
best regards
patrick

[AndyB]

DouDou555, could You post how is marked the combat S84/98 bayonet, thanks.A.

[DOUDOU555]

DouDou555, could You post how is marked the combat S84/98 bayonet, thanks.A.

The combat bayonet is marqued rich.a.horder 38.

[DOUDOU555]

hello
re
you can find this same gravur in the original HOLLER catalog!!
best regards
patrick

Somebody can post a scan of this gravur from this holler catalog please ?
Thanks a lot !
Franck.

[AndyB]

The combat bayonet is marqued rich.a.horder 38.

Hello Thanks, i assume the marking is Rich.A.Herder, made in 1938, could You provide the letter of series under serial number? the scabbard is matched to bayonet? thanks.

[DOUDOU555]

Hello Thanks, i assume the marking is Rich.A.Herder, made in 1938, could You provide the letter of series under serial number? the scabbard is matched to bayonet? thanks.

Andy, thank you for your interest, I will pass it in private message when I get home.
To avoid confusion, I wish that we remain focused on the bayonet engraved in this post please.