SS-stamp on bajonett-frog

[madandi]

Is their any chance, that this could be an original stamp?
Haven´t seen such a stamp before.

[rick1]

I would say no.

[besslein]

[AndyB]

As You could see the differences in stamp of maker and the runes, i believe there is already the answer, the runes were stamped about max.20 year ago.

[madandi]

I don´t believe that it is an original stamp, but i can´t follow your arguments.
I have the frog longer than 20 years in my collection and i didn´t stamp it
The maker stamp was stamped in the fabric, a possible "SS" stamp was stamped later. Different Stamp, different man who did it.
But again, i agree, that the stamp is not original. I just want to see your opinions.
Perhaps there are other items, stamped in the same way.

[Frogprince]

A postwar added stamp, these have been faked longer than 20 years. If you look at some "SS" daggers and swords, it has been at least 47 years for some of them for which we have proof. Fake etched "SS" bayonets about the same that we know of. And with some fakes even longer. FP

[rajko84]

I agree it is a fake, big difference between the stamps.

[byf45]

I would say no i have an ss mark frog and its much different