SS Dagger comments please.

[peter g barber]

What I have here is an unmarked SS dagger in a 33 scabbard, I have had different views on the dagger the consensus being it is a transitional SS dagger of which there where nearly 10,000 made , then again as is always there are those who say parts , please could I have your comments, I have stripped down the dagger to expose all, any further info needed I will try to oblige.
Peter

[peter g barber]

pic2

[peter g barber]

pic

[peter g barber]

pic3

[peter g barber]

pic4

[peter g barber]

pic5

[peter g barber]

pic6

[peter g barber]

pic7

[peter g barber]

pic8

[peter g barber]

pic9

[tobau]

I don't like the blade .

[Steve Co.]

Hi Peter , please have a look at the following link regarding blades with 1936 tang marking ;

http://daggers.infopop.cc/groupee/fo...3/m/8520084893


Regards Steve

[Larry Lipps]

It appears that these blades are questionable to the point that I would personally pass. It's a very scarry blade that could cause a lot of grief in the future.

[peter g barber]

Thanks Steve,
I did read the thread, and yet again all the toing and throwing it finishes with the comment from the "FROGPRINCE" and now it's all as clear as mud again


Peter

[peter g barber]

I admit to posting this dagger in a thread on GD some time ago looking for answers, I had comments like " I HAVE NO DOUBT IN MY MIND THAT THIS BLADE IS ORIGINAL" and " I LIKE IT A LOT " and other good comments, but again was split with the same apprehensions shown by Larry and Tobau,it's all very frustrating .
Peter