Helmut Weitze

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chaplain visor cap very nice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Chaplain visor cap very nice

    on a german auction house this chaplain visor cap was for sale.
    Maker "Albert Fischer Leipzig"

    I just want to know what you think about. Sorry I only have this one photos out of the auction

    https://www.andreas-thies.de/onTEAM/...65_257_288.pdf

    Lot No. 333
    Attached Files

    #2
    There was an A. Fischer retailer of military equipments in Landsbergerstr. 37 of Leipzig:

    http://digital.slub-dresden.de/werka.../92896/1911/0/
    http://digital.slub-dresden.de/werka...f/92896/234/0/
    http://digital.slub-dresden.de/werka.../92896/1510/0/

    Only one picture, as used in Thies auctions, is absolutely insufficient to judge it, but I do not like the front badges anyway.

    Best regards

    Comment


      #3
      Only one picture, as used in Thies auctions, is absolutely insufficient to judge it, but I do not like the front badges anyway.


      I'm with enorepap ,I don't liche the frontal badges
      Carlo

      Comment


        #4
        I had the cap today in my hands! It's was a very nice 100% original chaplain cap! Gratulation to the new owner!

        Comment


          #5
          Bullion crosses are a great source of controversy.
          Janke cranked them out by the thousands.
          I have yet to see a period photo of a bullion cross in wear, but they are regularly on "chaplain" visors for sale today.


          There is a thread that deals with this:


          http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...light=chaplain


          As for the hat itself, w/o the all-critical interior and under the hood pix, no way to confirm originality.
          NEC SOLI CEDIT

          Comment


            #6
            Just the way the piping above and below the cap band bulges in and out this hat could only be from a sinner/repro artist. From this one image I would not think it's original at all.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by stonemint View Post
              Bullion crosses are a great source of controversy.
              I have yet to see a period photo of a bullion cross in wear,
              As for the hat itself, w/o the all-critical interior and under the hood pix, no way to confirm originality.
              I fully agree with Stonemint about judgment of the cap itself, even if it doesn't make me crazy.....
              About the period photos I saved this old footage( I think I got it here on this forum) from which I have extrapolated these two still images......if I'm not wrong that is a bullion cross......
              All my best from Turin
              Giorgio
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #8
                Nice images, thanks for posting!

                Regarding auction houses and photos, they drive me completely nuts!

                For example, the auction house selling this cap only had one photo of it.
                I asked them to email me more photos but instead of doing that, they uploaded them to their website instead which obviously drove the bidding up. Yeah, thanks for that!

                http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=985218

                Another auction house I know in Germany charges 5 euro extra per additional photo you ask for!!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Well. I reiterate that with a single image this is an unattractive Russian roulette where the odds are very low and the price very high. Perhaps he was Baldur's (also on auction) personal druid and then it will be a big hit; maybe it's a painful reassembly and then it will be a bad stumbling block.

                  Actually in the magnificent thread recalled by Stonemint (fed with great capacity by Chris Liontass and still active after six years) there are rare examples of embroidered visors' crosses. However, even assuming that they are exactly of the type under examination, they are well spaced with respect to the intermediate piping and do not enter deeply, as in the present case, in the space between the upper leaves of the oak & cockade. Furthermore, it seems to me that the background material of the front badges is made of two different color (darker for the eagle and the cross); therefore, in truth, the cross would be individually cut out and superimposed, but from the single image is not given to appreciate and estimate the quality of the seams. Even the true color of the pipings is, in my opinion, impossible to determine in a very accurate way. Finally, it seems to me that there is a strange sign under the right wing of the eagle. Perhaps the hole of a previous metal eagle? In this case, it would be clear that the new embroidered eagle was placed too low precisely to cover clumsily these signs and this caused the necessarily squeezing of the cross.

                  Sorry for all my "if" & "it seems to me". For any complaints, please contact Mr. Thies who saves on the photos ... rather if Casey lights up with his opinion and Steiner (who say he has had his cap in his own hands) has some additional photography, that would be very useful ...

                  Best regards

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I am not so sure this depicts a bullion cross--to me, it appears to be a machine-embroidered cross on a padded backing.
                    It is definitely not the "Janke" type we see so often.
                    Attached Files
                    NEC SOLI CEDIT

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Yes Chris, in my opinion a cross for a "crusher"

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by stonemint View Post
                        It is definitely not the "Janke" type we see so often.
                        Agree...

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Hi,

                          some close-ups of the cap, courtesy of Andreas Thies.

                          The cap was sold for 1,700 euros (without fees).

                          See You

                          Vince
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Many thanks Vince I now think that these detailed images leave little room for imagination. A second hole is now visible under the left wing. The cross is spurious and the eagle seems to have been applied by a farrier. It seems to me that there is enough to compliment the new owner

                            Best regards

                            Comment


                              #15
                              [So what now?

                              Cap is not good?




                              QUOTE=enorepap;8328138]Many thanks Vince I now think that these detailed images leave little room for imagination. A second hole is now visible under the left wing. The cross is spurious and the eagle seems to have been applied by a farrier. It seems to me that there is enough to compliment the new owner

                              Best regards[/QUOTE]

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X