-
-
-
Hallo arno
From the pictures that you've sent, I'm sure it is the Forstdienst visor that Steiner showed last January:
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...try+erel+visor
In my opinion, it is OK
Best regardsComment
-
original
leather visor are not often encountered on EREL
Comment
-
Comment
-
Arno I have the same of your ,with leather bill,
I have to point the eagle its not for foresty becose le eagle should look to the the left looking in front of hat, I think it was changed.
I think it's a political eagle 1° issue.
CarloComment
-
This is mine with eagle looking to leftComment
-
And the peak stiffener it's good ?
because they look like two drops of water other al capComment
-
Yes everytthins is ok ,not the eagle
CarloComment
-
Hallo Arno
Very good. Now we see the light at the end of the ... grommet.
If you want, you can avoid, in my opinion, to show the Transport & GJ. I already know them: they are EREL and no one will ever be able to tell you if the edelweiss was affixed at the time or later, unless you're willing to take it apart with caution, or if the blue pipings are slightly lighter or darker than the regulations required. Rather, let’s go with that cavalry visor with skull !
MarcelloComment
-
I echo the above.Originally posted by enorepap View PostHallo Arno
Very good. Now we see the light at the end of the ... grommet.
If you want, you can avoid, in my opinion, to show the Transport & GJ. I already know them: they are EREL and no one will ever be able to tell you if the edelweiss was affixed at the time or later, unless you're willing to take it apart with caution, or if the blue pipings are slightly lighter or darker than the regulations required. Rather, let’s go with that cavalry visor with skull !
MarcelloNEC SOLI CEDITComment
-
Hallo Arno
Any news about your 5th Cavalry regiment visor?
MarcelloComment
-
Comment