WH M43 cap

[Gergo B.]

Any opinions are welcomed.

<a href="http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Ts1DOILr" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.postimage.org/Ts1DOILr.jpg" border="0" alt="Free image hosting powered by PostImage.org" /></a>

[Gergo B.]

2.

[Gergo B.]

3.

[Gergo B.]

4.

[Gergo B.]

5.

[Gergo B.]

6.

[Gergo B.]

7.

[Gergo B.]

8.

[hcliffe]

Tough to tell from these pics. General construction appears to be okay, and the wool is convincing, but something tells me post war assembled.

[Christian_GJR3]

.

I think that the eagle has been put on it professionally. But not originally. The wear on the cap and on the eagle just don't match.

[Lenny W]

post war made cap imo

[Dr Peter P.]

I think that the eagle has been put on it professionally. But not originally. The wear on the cap and on the eagle just don't match.

I've had this cap in my hands...nothing is wrong with it...

[J. Csernus]

I had this one in my hands aswell, in my opinion it's an untouched original, but better pics would be more convincing.

[Gergo B.]

Gents, more detailed pictures.

[90th Light]

I like this cap very much. From what I can tell from computer images, there is something about that wool which says original 1944. I like the construction and the wear pattern as well.

Would need a hands on to be sure but my vote at this stage is original pre-May 45,

Chris