Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_a33ce15d731f89dbddf87d5d0ea9978970f21ef6f2b922c2, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Army EM/NCO M-34 Feldmutze Overseas Cap - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
WW2Treasures

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Army EM/NCO M-34 Feldmutze Overseas Cap

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    Army EM/NCO M-34 Feldmutze Overseas Cap

    I am looking for opinions on this M-34, not so much for originality but on the issue of the soutache and if this would be an approprite issue (year wise) for a Heer soldier that was initially a second wave reservist in 1941 and subsequently called up in the summer of 1942. I know that all M34's originally had a soutache that I.D.'d branch service until a regulation in 1942 abolished its use. My understanding that they were to be removed from the caps. Do you think that this applies to this cap and is this issue cap (year wise) appropriate for the Heer soldier I outlined. I believe so on both but would love any confirmation from the forum. Thanks in advance
    Best regards,
    Todd
    [IMG][/IMG]
    Tags: None
    #2
    One more cap with the same questions. Thanks again
    Best regards,
    Todd[IMG][/IMG]
    Last edited by Westmark; 05-12-2008, 01:53 AM.

    Comment

      #3
      [IMG][/IMG]

      Comment

        #4
        [IMG][/IMG]

        Comment

          #5
          [IMG][/IMG]

          Comment

            #6
            [IMG][/IMG]

            Comment

              #7
              I like the second cap better..both had soutache..The first ones inside is in 2 materials ..a period rework most likely..Billbert

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by billbert View Post
                I like the second cap better..both had soutache..The first ones inside is in 2 materials ..a period rework most likely..Billbert
                I respectfully disagree that having 2 different lining materials means it is a rework. Just my opinion.
                HC

                Comment

                  #9
                  PLEASE dont put words in my mouth .. In this case it dictates a rework..I DID NOT SAY when two materials are used it is a rework.. In this cap however I beleive its true.. JMHO Billbert

                  Comment

                    #10
                    My misunderstanding then Billbert.
                    HC

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Billbert and hcliff,
                      Thank you for your replys. Just from a "look" standpoint I do prefer the second of the two. This would have been an issued item for a Heer soldier in 1941? Just double checking.
                      Best to all,
                      Todd

                      Comment

                        #12
                        prabbobly early "42" i like the shellenberg cap i have a few myself m-34's and m-42's
                        Give a man an opinion and you feed him for a day,
                        teach a man to use the "search" function on the WAF and you feed him for a lifetime.

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Danke..Billbert

                          Comment

                          Previous template Next

                          Users Viewing this Thread

                          Collapse

                          There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

                          Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                          Working...
                          X