SS Panzer Officers Visor What's wrong?

[NTZ]

I need a laugh Nick, what's the other site?

I will email you as I have been down that road before.

[DonC]

The verdigris a nice touch
__________________________________________________ _____________
Cheers Steve

Hi Steve -

I am certain that the verdegris could well be orginal - the question, of course, is what cap was it original to? I don't think it's the one pictured!

Don

[Schwarz]

Original US Frankenstein but some parts of this Schirmmutze have seen the war though

[Kreager]

What a shame. It was probably a nice CW cap before some moran ripped out the guts

[BrianK]

Another Panzer SS Visor Cap

Go to www.usmbooks.com to see another interesting SS officer visor cap,

[Karl S.]

Go to www.usmbooks.com to see another interesting SS officer visor cap,

Wow $4250. for a Janke, I just got one for under $150.

[Karl S.]

Janke inside

[NTZ]

Some people smoke too much crack.

[TonyS]

Some people smoke too much crack.

As well as not knowing a real cap from a fake, that guy does not know the copyright laws either:

This USM Books website is Copyright © 2007 by USM, Inc., and the text and images on it are fully protected by international copyright law. It is therefore, illegal for anyone to take any of the material found here and use it for their own purposes without our written permission, irrespective of any excuse they may feel they have for doing so.

Here is the law in the USA:

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the Copyright Act (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” Although fair use was not mentioned in the previous copyright law, the doctrine has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years. This doctrine has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered “fair,” such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Posting photos and text here for discussion and education and even criticism is certainly NOT illegal.........

[Bobwirtz]

I think the question should have been: What's right?

Bob