Black SS Visor

[Ostmark]

Hallo

I have the chance to buy this visor and want to check if its a good
one, because SS Visors are a minefield ...

Here we go

[Ostmark]

..

[Ostmark]

...

[Ostmark]

....

[Ostmark]

......

[Ostmark]

IMO it looks like a good one to me, but i am no expert ... so all opinons
are welcome

PS: That are all pics i have got so far ....

Grüsse
Herbert

[Kreager]

Take a look at the mark on the visor, as well as the deep crosshatching. I don't like that at all. But lets see what others have to say.

[SNIPER7]

Agree with Kreager....

[BenVK]

Sorry, about the only original thing about this cap is the chinstrap which is probably from a kepi.

[NTZ]

Sorry but I have to agree with the rest. The RZM tag is bad, so is the RZM stamp on the visor. Although the lining and shield is a decent reproduction they are just that, reproduction. JMHO

[Ostmark]

Thx a lot for your response

As i mentioned before, its a minefield

I was told that the visor is from a vet, but I never buy a story

[NTZ]

I do think the exterior materials are pretty good. The ribbed cap band is pretty damm close. The first thing that stood out for me was the RZM stamp on the visor and a five-digit number on the RZM tag.

[Robert H]

This cap has some certain big issues, from the tag to the stamp and the used material etc. When you make your homework the % goes way lower to step on a mine in the minefield.

[Felix]

add fake insignias on top of what others have said!

[Antiquefrog]

Intriguing cap, but wrong IMO. Certainly RZM mark on visor rather poor, and agree, I have never seen a 5-digit # on the label, though god knows why they are all 6-digits. Anybody know who Hersteller #11 is (was)?