Ben taking aside any arguments of these caps being produced post 1940 I still see problems. Unless the photos are giving a false impression the imprints in the lining that show where the soiling ends and the sweatband lays look to be well below the current sweatband. Not to mention in pic #10 you can see where those lines abruptly end. Then past that point there is no indicator where the sweatband sat. In fact the sweat, dirt and grime continue all the way to the cap base in the back. Then we can talk about how the lining sits. In the same photo you can see there is no pattern for the pleats. The lining appears to be too big for the cap. Again in the rear the lining looks too big and is pulled all the way to the base. I have seen this look many times before and it has always been on put together caps. You also mentioned your cap was late war with reprocessed wool. The quality of your wool is still substantially higher than the subject cap. Let us not forget it also has a pressed paper visor.
One last thing. Ben I am not sold that yours was produced post 1940. I see nothing that would indicate that. The wool looks pretty good to me.
One last thing. Ben I am not sold that yours was produced post 1940. I see nothing that would indicate that. The wool looks pretty good to me.
Comment