Kirby
I agree that this is an obvious assumption and all the examples that you have cited, ring perfectly true.
There is and in my opinion however, a huge defect to this obvious assumption.
The Marine-HJ was a large organisation within the HJ per se and even in 1933, there was a special department within the RJF(dept. FMR), responsible for special HJ formations to include air, motor, naval and riding related. The naval contingency as an organisation within an organisation, enjoying a dedicated uniform, insignia etc.
Why do we not see the "gold" buckle more regularly ?
A potentially original one surfaces so infrequently, that I find it hard to believe that this was specifically a Marine-HJ item.
Regards,
David
I agree that this is an obvious assumption and all the examples that you have cited, ring perfectly true.
There is and in my opinion however, a huge defect to this obvious assumption.
The Marine-HJ was a large organisation within the HJ per se and even in 1933, there was a special department within the RJF(dept. FMR), responsible for special HJ formations to include air, motor, naval and riding related. The naval contingency as an organisation within an organisation, enjoying a dedicated uniform, insignia etc.
Why do we not see the "gold" buckle more regularly ?
A potentially original one surfaces so infrequently, that I find it hard to believe that this was specifically a Marine-HJ item.
Regards,
David
Comment