Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_a9e1c95a592d2ba215126201012357396d271e4eac701692, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Discussion needed re: this eStand buckle - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
SandeBoetik

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Discussion needed re: this eStand buckle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Kirby is absolutely correct and I have been keeping count that there are a few 193x pebbled buckles with this stamp which makes them early war acceptance stamps. This is opposite of this being a late war stamp believed by Old Flags in the link provided by Edelweisse. Interesting that within the link provided by Edelweisse all the photos provided by OldFlags shows the Eagle over M stamp except the one he refers to as late war and rare.

    This is why I asked for more dated proof of this stamp as it should provide us a timeline of when the stamp came into existence.

    Comment


      #32
      Hello Dan, Great speaking with you again. This is one of two depot stamps one being a little larger than the other. The better question (as you stated) in so many words Dan is when the Navy started doing this? Maybe Eduardo could step in and shed some light on the subject.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by KC1 View Post
        Glaser - Truly appreciate your contributions. Do you have any "swas over M in eight" and dated pieces. I ask this as it may help in identifying when this stamp came into existence. In the link provided my Edelweisse, OldFlags says the stamp is a late war stamp; might you have any idea as to when this stamp started making its appearance?
        I observed 1938, 1939, 1940 and 1943 dated ones.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Andy C. View Post
          Hello Dan, Great speaking with you again. This is one of two depot stamps one being a little larger than the other. The better question (as you stated) in so many words Dan is when the Navy started doing this? Maybe Eduardo could step in and shed some light on the subject.
          That would be great if he could join the discussion - Eduardo's specialty is KM. Thanks Andy.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by glaser View Post

            I observed 1938, 1939, 1940 and 1943 dated ones.
            Thank you Glaser - your input has been invaluable and the end result we are trying to unravel is when this acceptance stamp came into play and why are there numerous KM acceptance stamps? As stated previously, we know the Luftwaffe used LBA +/- (x), the Postschutz used DRP +/-the (city designator), the Deutsche Reichsbahn had DRB. So again, why numerous KM acceptance stamps.

            Comment


              #36
              some examples on metal

              Comment


                #37
                Nothing wrong with this acceptance stamp. Seen many examlles of unquestionably genuine items over the years, ranging from belt buckle tabs to ammo pouches, even on the case for a Heeres Atmer apparently used by the KM. Here's one on the compressed air bottle of a life vest.
                Not wanting to speak on behalf of Eduardo, but there are several examples of this stamp on items in his excellent KM book..
                Martin
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #38
                  Thanks Martin for your input.

                  Comment

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                  Working...
                  X