Hello there, I have a original mint SWB with 65 mm on its back. This SWB was made by K&Q. I am asking for opinions on this 65 SWB. Pictures to follow. Thanks!
-
-
2
K&Q SWB's reverse with 65 mm -
3
65 mm on this SWB's reverseComment
-
4
Close up picture of this K&Q SWB's cast in pin assembly setupComment
-
5
Close up picture of its catchComment
-
I think you've got a winner there.
Looks like a typical K&Q.
Comment
-
Nothing wrong with the SWB but mint is a overstatement IMHO.Regards
Hans N
Don´t throw away your fake WB´s! Get in touch with me.
I collect them for reference purposes for the benefit of the hobby (for the right "fake" price of course).Comment
-
a
Very nice late war badge!Comment
-
Nice original K&Q SWB
But unless the camera is lieing, it's not what I would call "mint"; I'm yet to see a K&Q SWB zincer that is "mint" - almost all the K&Q zincer's absorb alot of the silver finish.
MikeComment
-
This one is closer to mint
Regards
Hans N
Don´t throw away your fake WB´s! Get in touch with me.
I collect them for reference purposes for the benefit of the hobby (for the right "fake" price of course).Comment
-
revRegards
Hans N
Don´t throw away your fake WB´s! Get in touch with me.
I collect them for reference purposes for the benefit of the hobby (for the right "fake" price of course).Comment
-
And it came in a caseRegards
Hans N
Don´t throw away your fake WB´s! Get in touch with me.
I collect them for reference purposes for the benefit of the hobby (for the right "fake" price of course).Comment
-
The centered marked with large or small digits are overall better made from the sister above the catch mark.
Are earlier made and later made the WB;s marked above the catch.sigpicComment
Comment