Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_a625d2d1d3a5b5f219c48d4fe74f05ee2b5b63f42deb469b, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Verwundeten abzeichen in Schwarz, worn is an understatement - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Emedals - Medalbook

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Verwundeten abzeichen in Schwarz, worn is an understatement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Verwundeten abzeichen in Schwarz, worn is an understatement

    Hello, Gentlemen.
    I just received this black wound badge today from my favorite dealer for a giveaway price. It is worn, rusted, corroded and has a bent pin to list a few of it's faults. But it looked like it had been through the war for sure. I have never owned a wound badge with this type of hinge and catch. They are an integral part of the badge rather than having been soldered onto the badge. Is this type pre-1945 design?

    Robert

    #2
    and the reverse...

    Comment


      #3
      Hi Robert,

      Nice and 100% original badge. The same one is also shown in Tucker's new book on page 227. It's difficult to see but the one in tucker's book is maker marked "65". I think I can see a mm on the yours also on the left lower side of the helmet. Can you make out witch number it is?

      regards
      Philippe

      Comment


        #4
        Phillipe,
        You have good eyes! The dealer never caught this and I never thought to check. Yes, it is #65. Thank you very much for the help here.

        Robert

        Comment


          #5
          These Klein & Quenzer black wound badges are hyper detailed compared to many other makers of black wound badges. Even on the back, there is crisp, consistant detail. Definitely a favorite of mine.

          I also wasnt aware of this version that has smaller numbers, closer to the rim on the helmet. The ones I have seen had the maker mark up higher, on the same baseline as the swaz.

          Still, an honest badge.

          Accidentally offending people on the internet since 1997

          Comment


            #6
            Here's a little better shot of the very shallow maker mark. I saw the marked '65' in Tucker's new book and noticed that the numbers were higher on the helmet as this piece....? Could there have been two seperate dies? I don't have a clue.

            Robert
            Attached Files

            Comment

            Users Viewing this Thread

            Collapse

            There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

            Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

            Working...
            X