Comments?
-
-Ralph Abercrombie -
reverse
I like it, myself. The repros I've seen are very crude, by comparison.
It has been suggested that the real ones are the crude ones, and that the fakers merely outdid themselves on the remakes.
Paranoia strikes deeep....-Ralph Abercrombie -
-
"Paranoia strikes deeep...."
wait for some other trustworthy replies Ralph...
regards
jonComment
-
Ralph....
i am not a very knowledgeable guy on these...but...that eagle looks pretty bogus...the feet especially....just my .02 worth.....
mikeComment
-
I've copied the comparisson picture that James kindly knocked up from the other thread.Originally posted by Ralph AI like it, myself. The repros I've seen are very crude, by comparison.
It has been suggested that the real ones are the crude ones, and that the fakers merely outdid themselves on the remakes.
Paranoia strikes deeep....
As I said in that post, I'm not saying it's a fake as I honestly don't know. But up to about a year ago, the only ones I'd ever seen were the type with the hidden tip to the left (right side as you view it) rune. Now all of the ones I'm seeing are these others, with sharper more defined features.
There are also a lot more about now, previously I had only ever seen maybe 1 in a year or so. When this one first appeared in the other thread it was the 4th I'd seen in 3 months. Since then I've seen another 2, both the sharp versions.
The version shown in Manions Vol 4 is the darker one with poorer definition. I don't know if there is an image in Tieste.
Cheers
DonLast edited by Don Scowen; 11-06-2005, 05:32 AM.Comment
-
Here's the two tinnies shown in both catalogs.Comment
-
Thanks James, should have guessed you'd come to the rescueOriginally posted by jnoble
Interesting to that Tieste also has the version with the tip of the rune touching the skull.
Cheers
DonComment
Comment