Hi Everyone,
I've had this for some years and always been unsure what to make of it. I seem to remember reading the mark was considered fantasy. However, more recently I read a post in which Wim said that the mark had possibly been identified.
Whilst I've had my doubts about the badge, it would also seem to have many reassuring aspects: pebbling looks good; enamel shows wear consistent with true originals; enamel itself looks good (small area of the white has been repaired). On the downside, the reverse generally looks poorly done and makes me suspicious.
Anyway, I would be interested to hear what others think.
Best,
Toby.
I've had this for some years and always been unsure what to make of it. I seem to remember reading the mark was considered fantasy. However, more recently I read a post in which Wim said that the mark had possibly been identified.
Whilst I've had my doubts about the badge, it would also seem to have many reassuring aspects: pebbling looks good; enamel shows wear consistent with true originals; enamel itself looks good (small area of the white has been repaired). On the downside, the reverse generally looks poorly done and makes me suspicious.
Anyway, I would be interested to hear what others think.
Best,
Toby.
Comment