NSDAP badge(s)

[viinaa]

One golden party badge and two regular ones, what do you guys think?
The member number seems oddly small though.

[TooDeep]

I'm a noob. But the numbers on the back of the GPB look deeper then normal.

Here is a good website for GPB info

[Zirnhelt]

The two party badges are real and in great condition. Vince

[salzmann]

for the GPB

[ErichS]

The GPB is original

[Wim Vangossum]

To me all badges look ok.

Regards, Wim

[sjl]

Not the best photos, but the GPB looks real. No problems I can see with the front and the back. Even with the globs of solder reattaching the pin the back looks fine too. The numbers are consistent with early 4-digit badges.


As always, better pictures would help.

[Br. James]

I agree: The large Deschler w/reattached safety pin is original -- the reattachment appears to be amateurish, possibly by the holder! Sorry that NSDAP Membership Number 1108 is not on my list of identified numbers.

The two Party Member badges appear to be original, as well.

Br. James

[salzmann]

Are all early 4-digit numbered badges marked that (unusual) way?

Not the best photos, but the GPB looks real. No problems I can see with the front and the back. Even with the globs of solder reattaching the pin the back looks fine too. The numbers are consistent with early 4-digit badges.


As always, better pictures would help.

[sjl]

I'll check my photo files, but original, first-run 1000 series GPBs were numbered like this.

[der-hase-fee]

The GPB is original

Agree.


1108-1.jpg

1108-2.jpg

[salzmann]

Meanwhile I checked my files. There are many under 1000 underlined but with the normally deschler numbers. I have learned that a underlined number a sign of a early badge is.

I'll check my photo files, but original, first-run 1000 series GPBs were numbered like this.