Medalbar

[Mike TM]

Hello, what do you think about this medal bar, any incorrect?

Thanks in advanded
Mike

[Reinhard2]

The medals and their range are okay. If they have been put together during or after the war is different to say with this type of barr.

[DanCz]

A nice grouping for sure - well done !

[sniper11]

It's a nice bar don't see anything wrong with it.
Troy

[Tony T-S]

The finish, especially on the 10 year is really good. It would be nice to know who it belonged to.

[der-hase-fee]

I believe the 15 year is controversial at best.

[DanCz]

Now you have got me doubting my opinion - - - - whilst i am not a fan of the short tail letter "f" in "fur" - - - - but those with ring maker mark 30 do show this feature.

Is always difficult to make a proper judgement from pictures.

[Ian Hulley]

I believe the 15 year is controversial at best.

I agree entirely. The quality just isn't there in my opinion, look around the edges of the blue enamel.

Ian

[PaulR]

Wow. It is beautiful!

[Tony T-S]

Looking again at the 15 years I see what Ian means about the enamel. The eagle is not as crisp as on the 10 year, but that may just be a different maker.

[Jean-Claude]

The finish, especially on the 10 year is really good. It would be nice to know who it belonged to.

Agreed! Finish looks too nice for a zinker on this 10 year. My guess would be its an aluminum/cupal specimen which is lighter than both the tombac or zink versions.

JC