Mothers cross

[VonPeter]

Hi,
Opinion please.
Im not an expert but I dont like it due to the fat white, the sunburst and what may be surplus material in the letter "R".

I know there are really good museum quality reproductions of these crosses out there so what do you think?

P.S. The ribbon also looks bad.

/Peter

[jabnus]

Run away, everything on this one is fake!

[eraser]

Crapola all the way

[VonPeter]

Just as I suspected, thanks for the help.

[Woolgar]

The wording on the reverse should be etched not raised

Nick

[jabnus]

No they should be stamped for the "16 dezember 1938" model, or handengraved for the first model.

I don't think the inscription here is raised, it's more like a visual illusion because of the on purpose made bad photo to hide the pitting and other bad details, if you look more closely you can see it is not raised.

[Woolgar]

No they should be stamped for the "16 dezember 1938" model, or handengraved for the first model.

I don't think the inscription here is raised, it's more like a visual illusion because of the on purpose made bad photo to hide the pitting and other bad details, if you look more closely you can see it is not raised.

Cant see it, it still looks raised to me

Nick