Vorlaufiges Besitzzeugnis , Knightscross

[voelender]

Hi guy's
About a week ago , I bought this Urkunde, as a fake.
When it arrived I did some research and found out the the combination of the name is correct. On a lot of fakes this is not the case.

http://www.das-ritterkreuz.de/index_...chword=rickert

I did some more research and found out that the Urkunde I bought was sold on an auction for € 625.00.....
https://www.sixbid.com/browse.html?a...226&lot=565598

Now the question is, did I bought just a fake or was I lucky, or sold the auction house this fake as a real one..... ???
I think it is a fake that I bought I just want to be sure.

[voelender]

the rest of the pictures

[hucks216]

The signature looks very shaky, especially the z at the end and the smudged ink is a good way to hide someone's attempt at a signature. And if it is water damage that has caused it, it is a bit of a coincidence that the only part of the citation showing water damage just happens to be the signature.

[Simon O.]

It's also the wrong typeface used in October 44

[MIG]

Yes, for that time it should be the so-called "Führerschreibmaschine" typeface.

[voelender]

So fake ??

[JUNGCO]

Yes, fake.