Original or Repro?

[Stickfigure21]

I know this existed but I'm not sure if this is an original or a reproduction. If it's a reproduction that's fine I bought it for reenacting, and if it's an original even better just looking to find out.


- Steve

[crowback]

Looks like something from late 1960's early 1970's.

[Stickfigure21]

Looks like something from late 1960's early 1970's.

That's what I was thinking, it looks old, but not THAT old


- Steve

[byterock]

Yout can tell by the staples.

I have the same one handy but in English.

The originals I have seen where glued or had smaller staples, and where always having the pages falling or almost falling out. Prining was very low quality as was the paper.

Orignal date from just before the war no Reichsmarschall or Marschall ranks present.

Used by the CW and US as a tempate for thier idenity books during the war and god only knows how many books after the war

Still a nice referace to have handy.

[Stickfigure21]

Yout can tell by the staples.

I have the same one handy but in English.

The originals I have seen where glued or had a single staple, and where always having the pages falling or almost falling out. Prining was very low quality as was the paper.

Orignal date from just before the war no Reichsmarschall or Marschall ranks present.

Used by the CW and US as a tempate for thier idenity books during the war and god only knows how many books after the war

Still a nice referace to have handy.

Exactly what I thought too, nice for reference, thanks for your help gents


- Steve

[aksel90]

probably a copy

The original booklets have been issued by Moritz Ruhl in the 1930s.
The print was very good, only clean colors were used, not raster print.
This booklet appears to be printed on a raster print.