Originally posted by Ludwig
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dirlewanger signature
Collapse
X
-
Dirlewanger signatures would be rare the same way a Peiper signature is way rarer than a Sepp Dietrich one. As divisions commander Dietrichs signature would be on iron Cross documents for a whole division... Peipers limited to the Panzerkampfabz. etc for a regiment.
As far as I know, there is no way Dirlewanger as Colonel equiv ever awarded an Iron Cross.
The fakers need some infantry assault badge document blanks...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Boonzaier View PostDirlewanger signatures would be rare the same way a Peiper signature is way rarer than a Sepp Dietrich one. As divisions commander Dietrichs signature would be on iron Cross documents for a whole division... Peipers limited to the Panzerkampfabz. etc for a regiment.
As far as I know, there is no way Dirlewanger as Colonel equiv ever awarded an Iron Cross.
The fakers need some infantry assault badge document blanks...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Boonzaier View PostDirlewanger signatures would be rare the same way a Peiper signature is way rarer than a Sepp Dietrich one. As divisions commander Dietrichs signature would be on iron Cross documents for a whole division... Peipers limited to the Panzerkampfabz. etc for a regiment.
As far as I know, there is no way Dirlewanger as Colonel equiv ever awarded an Iron Cross.
The fakers need some infantry assault badge document blanks...
I am not a paperitem collector (if it isn't in my interest zone), but I have put some time to read and study pictures of original dirlwanger unit papers I have seen and considered good by others. I have noticed that the fakers use different stamp than what is on the originals and on the originals, the very same stamp can be seen on all that are signed By Dirlewanger.
I can be wrong as I know nothing from paperitems basicly, but something I noticed (mainly on ISA docs actually).
But at the end of the war he was a Oberführer that was equivalent to a brigadier general according Wikipedia, maybe he was liscenced to sign docs?
I quote from wikipedia now "On 14 February 1945, the brigade was redesignated as the 36. Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS", basicly he was a divisional commander?
Best regards,
Daniel
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Boonzaier View PostSorry, I meant not like a "real" division... but still...
I am open to correction, but I would not buy this...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris Boonzaier View PostHi,
Oberführer is similar to a British Brigadier, but in German Ranks it is not a General Rank. More like senior Colonel.
You are either a General, or you are not... old Oskar was not,
If he had been Brigadeführer he would have been one.
As I am not a paperitem collector I don't know very much about the subject
Comment
-
That´s true! Oberführer is more of a "three star Oberst" (in fact I have seen good SS-Standartenführer collar tabs with three pips! – unofficial, but still).
But it´s a matter of command, not rank!
Dirlewanger was Kommandeur of a division – not a Führer (which is a temporary command, and would not have given him the right to award ICs.
Even if the 36.Waffen-Grenadier-Division der SS was not a full division – when talking about the number of men! (not many German division were by that time!), it was in March 1945 a division on the paper.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 5 users online. 0 members and 5 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment