AH photo with signature

[PeterPan]

Here is an original photo of Adolf Hitler from the 30's. What about the signature on it? The photo is absolute original period and comes with a correct frame.

[tystgaard]

Nice

Nice photo.

AH signatures are much faked, and only a signature on
a photo or postcard is very hard to authenticate.

I do like this one, and think it have a good chance of being good.
But let's see what the other members say, believe there are some great
experts on the forum.

BR
Nicolai

[max history]

Here is an authentic Adolf Hitler signed identical Hoffmann photograph. It is the wedding gift from Hitler to Gauleiter Josef Terboven, dated 28 June 1934 and was presented in a plain silver plate frame, in large format.
What do you think?
Max.

[MountainMan]

The first one is imo fake, dont like the signature at all, secound one fine and nice original.

[max history]

.....What do you think?
Max.

My question was for the original poster.
Max.

[MountainMan]

What he should think? He ask for opinion on his Signature. And this he gets. Its Fake

My question was for the original poster.
Max.

[max history]

What he should think? He ask for opinion on his Signature. And this he gets. Its Fake

You miss the point. I was trying to get him to come to his own conclusion. I know the example I posted at #3 is real (I said so in my post) and you are quite right to agree.
Max.

[MountainMan]

I know very well what you mean but dont get the point what you try to teach him. Your Picture is in a too low quality to see clear the signature, and Hitlers Signatures changed over the time 8 or 9 times. So i dont think to compare your Picture with that from the original Poster will help because both are Hoffmann Pictures, that one from you is a early Print, the other one is a later Print. So its not signed in the same timeperiode.

You miss the point. I was trying to get him to come to his own conclusion. I know the example I posted at #3 is real (I said so in my post) and you are quite right to agree.
Max.

[max history]

I know very well what you mean but dont get the point what you try to teach him. Your Picture is in a too low quality to see clear the signature, and Hitlers Signatures changed over the time 8 or 9 times. So i dont think to compare your Picture with that from the original Poster will help because both are Hoffmann Pictures, that one from you is a early Print, the other one is a later Print. So its not signed in the same timeperiode.

I am fully aware of Hitler's signature style and how it altered over the years. However, Hitler did not sign this particular photo (1934) later than early to mid-1935 as it was then replaced by more up-to-date images. Consequently, the style of the signature on the first photo is too late for this particular image. Even though the quality of my posted photo is not clear, it's obviously clear enough for you to declare it is authentic! What is plain is that the style of signature is correct for the time period (1934). The first signature style is much too late for this image it's on. I am trying to get him to come to his own conclusion rather than relying upon the opinions of others.
Max.

[MountainMan]

Sorry but i absolute not agree with you. How you could tell what picture Hitler sign at what time? It is easy possible that someone let him sign this postcard later. So simple to say there where more modern Postcards and Hitler dont sign this anymore is simple not true. Noone could say when he sign what. The signature on the first post is simple a fake, but have nada to do with the Postcard itself. If you could proof that Hitler never sign a early postcard at Wartime...well then you my Master

I am fully aware of Hitler's signature style and how it altered over the years. However, Hitler did not sign this particular photo (1934) later than early to mid-1935 as it was then replaced by more up-to-date images. Consequently, the style of the signature on the first photo is too late for this particular image. Even though the quality of my posted photo is not clear, it's obviously clear enough for you to declare it is authentic! What is plain is that the style of signature is correct for the time period (1934). The first signature style is much too late for this image it's on. I am trying to get him to come to his own conclusion rather than relying upon the opinions of others.
Max.

[max history]

You have your opinion and I have mine. I base mine on 52 years of studying Hitler and specializing in his handwriting and signatures for 40 of those years. All I was trying to do was to get the original poster to reach his own conclusions, but you seem to want to turn this into a major debate. Let's just leave it that we agree to disagree.

[MountainMan]

No absolute not a long debate is for nothing. All i want is, thats not impossible what i say. I had no time on weekend, but i have a old prewar Postcard fom Hitler with his late Signture, this is why i make my point, and of course because imo its logic.

You have your opinion and I have mine. I base mine on 52 years of studying Hitler and specializing in his handwriting and signatures for 40 of those years. All I was trying to do was to get the original poster to reach his own conclusions, but you seem to want to turn this into a major debate. Let's just leave it that we agree to disagree.

[PeterPan]

Wow! What a discussion..
I have this AH photo in my collection for several years now. It is in an original from with backside that can be opened. All I want is to know if the AH signature stands a chance being original. I agree that this photo might be early 30's but, of course, it may be possible that AH signed it much later.

Is it possible to tell me if this signature could be an original one?

[MountainMan]

Hi,

for this is a Forum existing, that Discussions going on, not only...yes or no. IMO your Signature on your Picture is not original. I dont like the Style and never seen one like yours. I do a bit digging in my Photos, here is one similar to yours. I still looking to find this type on and older Picture. I have one, but till now dont find it

Wow! What a discussion..
I have this AH photo in my collection for several years now. It is in an original from with backside that can be opened. All I want is to know if the AH signature stands a chance being original. I agree that this photo might be early 30's but, of course, it may be possible that AH signed it much later.

Is it possible to tell me if this signature could be an original one?

[max history]

Hi,

....I do a bit digging in my Photos, here is one similar to yours. I still looking to find this type on and older Picture. I have one, but till now dont find it

I don't think I need to say any more!